International Journal for Quality in Health Care 10:311-317 (1998)
© 1998 International Society for Quality in Health Care
Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies
0 Worthing and Southlands Hospitals NHS Trust, Lyndhurst Road, Worthing, BN11 2DH, UK
1 Health Sciences Research Centre, Chichester Institute, Chichester, UK
z Corresponding author
Tel: +44 1903 205111 ext. 5795
Fax: +44 1903 285045
E-mail: sitzia@mistral.co.uk
Objectives.To examine the quality of response rate reporting and to identify methodological factors influencing response rates in published patient satisfaction studies.
Design.Examination and analysis of 210 studies from 200 papers published in 1994 in 141 different health journals. Papers were located in the following databases: British Nursing Index, CINAHL, EMBASE, MedLine, Popline, and PsycLIT.
Main measures.Reported and calculated response rates, collection and recruitment procedures of published studies, and type of instruments used for data collections.
Results.Forty-eight per cent of studies reported a response rate. The mean response rate was 72.1%. There was no association between response rate and the type of instrument used for data collection. Studies which used a face-to-face approach to either subject recruitment (mean response rate, 76.7%) or data collection (mean response rate, 76.9%) were associated with significantly higher response rate than those in which subjects were recruited by mail (mean response rate, 66.5%) or data were collected by mail (mean response rate, 67%). Response rate was not related to questionnaire length.
Conclusion.Patient satisfaction studies generally show poor awareness of the importance of methodological issues relevant to response rate. Far more attention to this aspect is needed if findings in this field are to be accepted as valid and useful.
Keywords:health services research, mailed survey, patient satisfaction, response bias, research design, survey methods
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. Moret, J.-M. Nguyen, C. Volteau, B. Falissard, P. Lombrail, and I. Gasquet Evidence of a non-linear influence of patient age on satisfaction with hospital care Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2007; 19(6): 382 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. M. Edward, L. C. Lemaire, B. Preckel, F. J. Oort, M. J. L. Bucx, M. W. Hollmann, and J. C. J. M. de Haes Patient Experiences with the Preoperative Assessment Clinic (PEPAC): validation of an instrument to measure patient experiences Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2007; 99(5): 666 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Oltedal, A. Garratt, O. Bjertnaes, M. Bjornsdottir, M. Freil, and M. Sachs The NORPEQ patient experiences questionnaire: Data quality, internal consistency and validity following a Norwegian inpatient survey Scand J Public Health, October 1, 2007; 35(5): 540 - 547. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Ammentorp, A. M. Rasmussen, B. Norgaard, E. Kirketerp, and P.-E. Kofoed Electronic questionnaires for measuring parent satisfaction and as a basis for quality improvement Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2007; 19(2): 120 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. N. Heje, P. Vedsted, and F. Olesen A cluster-randomized trial of the significance of a reminder procedure in a patient evaluation survey in general practice. Int. J. Qual. Health Care, June 1, 2006; 18(3): 232 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. G. Myburgh, G. C. Solanki, M. J. Smith, and R. Lalloo Patient satisfaction with health care providers in South Africa: the influences of race and socioeconomic status Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2005; 17(6): 473 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Gonzalez, J. M. Quintana, A. Bilbao, A. Escobar, F. Aizpuru, A. Thompson, C. Esteban, J. A. S. Sebastian, and E. de la Sierra Development and validation of an in-patient satisfaction questionnaire Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2005; 17(6): 465 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Z. Tshandu CAPAM Symposium on Networked Government: Citizen satisfaction survey: a national review of the delivery of social services in the new South Africa International Review of Administrative Sciences, September 1, 2005; 71(3): 493 - 519. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Ammentorp, J. Mainz, and S. Sabroe Parents' Priorities and Satisfaction With Acute Pediatric Care Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, February 1, 2005; 159(2): 127 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Saal, M. Nuebling, Y. Husemann, and T. Heidegger Effect of timing on the response to postal questionnaires concerning satisfaction with anaesthesia care Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2005; 94(2): 206 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Schmidt, B.E. Holstein, J. Boivin, T. Tjornhoj-Thomsen, J. Blaabjerg, F. Hald, P.E. Rasmussen, and A. Nyboe Andersen High ratings of satisfaction with fertility treatment are common: findings from the Copenhagen Multi-centre Psychosocial Infertility (COMPI) Research Programme Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2638 - 2646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. KELLEY, B. CLARK, V. BROWN, and J. SITZIA Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research Int. J. Qual. Health Care, May 1, 2003; 15(3): 261 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. TOKUNAGA and Y. IMANAKA Influence of length of stay on patient satisfaction with hospital care in Japan Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2002; 14(6): 493 - 502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Collins, P. Nicolson, and I. Bowns Patient satisfaction in telemedicine Health Informatics Journal, June 1, 2000; 6(2): 81 - 85. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|