International Journal for Quality in Health Care 11:107-118 (1999)
© 1999 International Society for Quality in Health Care
Does The Complications Screening Program flag cases with process of care problems? Using explicit criteria to judge processes
0 Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, the Charles A. Dana Research Institute and the Harvard-Thorndike Laboratory,
1 Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health and
2 Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
Correspondence to: LI Iezzoni, Beth Deaconess Medical Center, East Campus, 330 Brookline Avenue, LY-326, Boston, MA 02215, USA
e-mail: Iiezzoni@bidmc.harvard.edu
Background. The Complications Screening Program (CSP) aims to identify 28 potentially preventable complications of hospital care using computerized discharge abstracts, including demographic information, diagnosis and procedure codes.
Objective. To validate the CSP as a quality indicator by using explicit process of care criteria to determine whether hospital discharges flagged by the CSP experienced more process problems than unflagged discharges.
Methods. The CSP was applied to computerized hospital discharge abstracts from Medicare beneficiaries 
65 years old admitted in 1994 to hospitals in California and Connecticut for major surgery or medical treatment. Of 28 CSP complications, 17 occurred sufficiently frequently to study. Discharges flagged (cases) and unflagged (controls) by the CSP were sampled and photocopied medical records were obtained. Physicians specified detailed, objective, explicit criteria, itemizing 'key steps' in processes of care that could potentially have prevented or caused complications. Trained nurses abstracted medical records using these explicit criteria. Process problem rates between cases and controls were compared.
Results. The final sample included 740 surgical and 416 medical discharges. Rates of process problems were high, ranging from 24.4 to 82.5% across CSP screens for surgical cases. Problems were lower for medical cases, ranging from 2.0 to 69.1% across CSP screens. Problem rates were 45.7% for surgical and 5.0% for medical controls. Rates of problems did not differ significantly across flagged and unflagged discharges.
Conclusions. The CSP did not flag discharges with significantly higher rates of explicit process problems than unflagged discharges. Various initiatives throughout the USA use techniques similar to the CSP to identify complications of care. Based on these CSP findings, such approaches should be evaluated cautiously.
Keywords:administrative data, discharge abstracts, hospital complications, processes of care, quality measurement
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. Berney and J. Needleman Impact of nursing overtime on nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in new york hospitals, 1995-2000. Policy Politics Nursing Practice, May 1, 2006; 7(2): 87 - 100. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Librero, M. Marin, S. Peiro, and A. V. Munujos Exploring the impact of complications on length of stay in major surgery diagnosis-related groups Int. J. Qual. Health Care, February 1, 2004; 16(1): 51 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. N. Weingart and L. I. Iezzoni Looking for Medical Injuries Where the Light Is Bright JAMA, October 8, 2003; 290(14): 1917 - 1919. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A E Powell, H T O Davies, and R G Thomson Using routine comparative data to assess the quality of health care: understanding and avoiding common pitfalls Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2003; 12(2): 122 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Michael Fitzmaurice, K. Adams, and J. M. Eisenberg Three Decades of Research on Computer Applications in Health Care: Medical Informatics Support at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2002; 9(2): 144 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|