International Journal for Quality in Health Care 11:119-130 (1999)
© 1999 International Society for Quality in Health Care
A measuring instrument for evaluation of quality systems
NIVEL, Netherlands Institute of Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Correspondence to: C Wagner, Netherlands Institute of Primary Health Care, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands
e-mail: cwagner@nivel.nl
Objective. To develop an instrument for provider organizations, consumers, purchasers, and policy makers to measure and compare the development of quality systems in provider organizations.
Design. Cross-sectional study of provider organizations using a structured questionnaire to survey managers.
Setting. The Netherlands.
Study participants. Provider organizations of six health care fields: primary health, care for the disabled, mental health care, care for the elderly, hospital care and welfare care.
Main measures. Existence of quality assurance and quality improvement activities.
Results. The study presents a survey instrument for assessing the quality assurance and improvement activities of health care provider organizations and the developmental stage of quality systems. The survey instrument distinguishes five focal areas for quality improvement activities and four developmental stages. The study also reports data on the reliability and validity of the survey instrument.
Conclusion. The instrument is reliable, easy to administer, and useful across health care fields as well as different kinds of organizations. Developing quality systems provide a common language across all parts of the health care sector. By assigning the activities to focal areas and developmental stages the instrument gives insight into the implementation of quality systems in health care. Comparable information on quality assurance activities increases the accountability of providers. Because of the efficient (not time consuming) approach, the instrument complements existing accreditation reviews.
Keywords:implementation, instrument, provider organizations, quality systems
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Duckers, P. Makai, L. Vos, P. Groenewegen, and C. Wagner Longitudinal analysis on the development of hospital quality management systems in the Netherlands Int. J. Qual. Health Care, October 1, 2009; 21(5): 330 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M J M H Lombarts, I Rupp, P Vallejo, R Sunol, and N S Klazinga Application of quality improvement strategies in 389 European hospitals: results of the MARQuIS project Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2009; 18(Suppl_1): i28 - i37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M J M H Lombarts, I Rupp, P Vallejo, N S Klazinga, and R Sunol Differentiating between hospitals according to the "maturity" of quality improvement systems: a new classification scheme in a sample of European hospitals Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2009; 18(Suppl_1): i38 - i43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. Hinchey, T. Shephard, S. T. Tonn, R. Ruthazer, H. P. Selker, and D. M. Kent Benchmarks and Determinants of Adherence to Stroke Performance Measures Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): 1619 - 1620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. M. SLUIJS and C. WAGNER Progress in the implementation of Quality Management in Dutch health care: 1995-2000 Int. J. Qual. Health Care, May 1, 2003; 15(3): 223 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|