Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yao, P
Right arrow Articles by Dodek, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yao, P
Right arrow Articles by Dodek, P
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 11:147-153 (1999)
© 1999 International Society for Quality in Health Care

Discordance between physicians and coders in assignment of diagnoses

P Yao0, BR Wiggs1,2, C Gregor2, R Sigurnjak2 and P Dodek1,2

0 Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
1 Center for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St Paul's Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, and
2 St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Correspondence to: Dr P Dodek, Center for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St Paul's Hospital, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 1Y6
e-mail: pedodek@unixg.ubc.ca

Objective. To measure concordance between physicians and medical record coders in their assignment of diagnoses.

Design. Prospective cohort series.

Setting. Five hundred and fifty-bed, tertiary-care, university teaching hospital.

Study participants. In-patients who were discharged from either the Cardiac Sciences Program (n = 125), the Renal Program (n = 43), or the HIV-AIDS Program (n = 25) during the period May 18-July 1, 1995.

Interventions. None.

Main outcome measures. Physicians and coders assigned diagnoses for individual in-patients based on their independent interpretations of the patient chart and discharge summary sheet. All assigned diagnoses were coded using the ICD-9-CM classification system. Concordance was measured for the most responsible diagnosis and for all assigned diagnoses. Difference in calculated resource intensity weights based on physicians' and coders' assignment of diagnoses was also calculated.

Results. Concordance rates for the most responsible diagnosis in each program were: Cardiac Sciences (27%; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 20-36%), Renal Program (35%; 95% CI = 21-53%), and HIV-AIDS Program (20%; 95% CI, 6-41%). Concordance rates for all diagnoses per chart were similar. Cardiac Sciences (20%; 95% CI, 14-25%), Renal Program (25%; 95% CI, 20-33%), and HIV-AIDS Program (29%; 95% CI, 25-44%). Resource intensity weights assigned by coders for the Cardiac Sciences and HIV-AIDS Program were significantly higher than those assigned by the physicians.

Keywords:abstracting and indexing, documentation, economics, hospital, medical records


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
T. Bhattacharyya, D. Chang, J. B. Meigs, D. M. Estok II, and H. Malchau
Mortality After Periprosthetic Fracture of the Femur
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2007; 89(12): 2658 - 2662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
T. Bhattacharyya, R. Iorio, and W. L. Healy
Rate of and Risk Factors for Acute Inpatient Mortality After Orthopaedic Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2002; 84(4): 562 - 572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.