Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JARLIER, A.
Right arrow Articles by CHARVET-PROTAT, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by JARLIER, A.
Right arrow Articles by CHARVET-PROTAT, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 12:125-131 (2000)
© 2000 International Society for Quality in Health Care

Can improving quality decrease hospital costs?

AGNES JARLIER1 and SUZANNE CHARVET-PROTAT1

1 Department of Health Economics, ANAES, Paris, France

Purpose. To determine whether the concept of «cost of quality» and the techniques used for its study in the industrial sector are also applicable to hospitals. Data sources. We undertook a systematic review of the literature published since 1992 (five electronic databases and a manual search) using keywords relating to quality in health acre and costs. Study selection. We selected all articles relating cost and quality, providing indicators for quality failure, determining the cost of failure, and itemizing the cost of quality. Twelve articles met these criteria (USA, nine; UK, one; Australia, one; France, one); six referred to total quality management, three to hidden costs, and three to adverse events. Data abstraction. For each article, we recorded the test hypothesis, the focus of the study and the main results on costs and quality. Results and data synthesis. Preventing failure by applying total quality management to a variety of projects (managed care project, setting-up a standard procedure...) led to financial savings; quality was maintained, even enhanced. Better communication and co-ordination reduced hidden costs and also increased quality. Adverse events prolonged hospital stays by 1.74-4 days and increased costs. Conclusion. Very few detailed articles related cost and quality and, although they all noted a positive impact of an emphasis on quality, they nevertheless had their shortcomings. Study periods were too short, the indirect aspects of cost and savings were not taken into account, economic reference values were omitted. We conclude that more precise and strict methods for quantifying costs are needed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.