Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maguerez, G.
Right arrow Articles by Matillon, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maguerez, G.
Right arrow Articles by Matillon, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 13:89-97 (2001)
© 2001 International Society for Quality in Health Care

Evaluation of 60 continuous quality improvement projects in French hospitals

Georges Maguerez1, Marie Erbault1, Jean Louis Terra1, Herve Maisonneuve1 and Yves Matillon1

1 Agence Nationale d'Accréditation et d'Evaluation en Santé (ANAES), Paris, France

Objective. To evaluate the feasibility of implementing continuous quality improvement (CQI) projects in French health care organizations.

Design. The French Ministry of Health issued two calls for CQI projects (in 1995 and 1996). ANAES was commissioned to monitor and evaluate the projects, and to provide advice.

Setting. ANAES in collaboration with French public hospitals.

Study participants. A jury selected 64 projects from 483 submissions. The first series of projects related to safety issues (e.g. blood transfusions), the second related chiefly to patient management.

Interventions. ANAES instructed project leaders in process analysis (modified four-step FOCUS-PDCA model), convened regular meetings between leaders and performed on-site visits.

Main outcome measurements. Objective outcomes: goal achievement, extension of projects to other topics and departments, allocation of resources. Subjective outcomes: changes in attitudes. Statistics were obtained from two questionnaires completed by project leaders.

Results. Four projects were discontinued; 82% (49 out of 60) met more than half their objectives. The CQI method was adopted by other departments in 65% and 50% (1st and 2nd series respectively) of cases. Hospital management often chose to provide continued support (81%/88%), offer training (59%/80%), create a CQI unit (62%/73%), and allocate a budget (61%/65%). A positive impact on staff attitudes was noted in over 75% of projects.

Conclusion. ANAES' co-ordinated initiative to acquaint a hard core of French public hospitals with CQI proved successful. Identification of the factors for success and of potential hurdles helped pave the way for the national hospital accreditation procedure currently underway.

Keywords: attitude of health personnel, continuous quality improvement, implementation, process assessment (health care), quality systems


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
E. Bradley, K. A. Hartwig, L. A. Rowe, E. J. Cherlin, J. Pashman, R. Wong, T. Dentry, W. E. Wood, and Y. Abebe
Hospital quality improvement in Ethiopia: a partnership-mentoring model
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2008; 20(6): 392 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Health Serv Res PolicyHome page
K. Mercer
Facilitating organizational mergers: amalgamation of community care access centres
J Health Serv Res Policy, January 1, 2008; 13(suppl_1): 46 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
S. M. Mohammadi, S. F. Mohammadi, J. R. Hedges, M. Zohrabi, and O. Ameli
Introduction of a quality improvement program in a children's hospital in Tehran: design, implementation, evaluation and lessons learned
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2007; 19(4): 237 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.