International Journal for Quality in Health Care 13:357-365 (2001)
© 2001 International Society for Quality in Health Care
Physician-reviewers' perceptions and judgments about quality of care
Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Charles A. Dana Research Institute and the Harvard-Thorndike Library,
Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health
Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
Objective. Although Peer Review Organizations (PROs) and researchers rely on physicians to assess quality of care, little is known about what physicians think about when they judge quality. We sought to identify features of individual cases that are associated with physicians' judgments.
Design. Using 1994 Medicare data, we selected hospitalizations for 1134 beneficiaries in 42 acute care hospitals in California and Connecticut. The sample was enriched with 17 surgical and six medical complications identified using diagnosis and procedure codes. PRO physicians confirmed quality problems using a structured implicit chart review instrument and provided written open-ended comments about each case. We coded physicians' comments for factors presumed to influence judgments about quality.
Results. In crude and adjusted comparisons, reviewers questioned quality more frequently in cases with serious or fatal outcomes, technical mishaps and inadequate documentation. Among surgical (but not medical) patients, they were less likely to record poor quality among patients presenting with an acute illness.
Conclusion. Factors other than the adequacy of key processes of care are associated with physician-reviewers' judgments about quality.
Keywords: complications, organization, peer review, quality of care