Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geboers, H.
Right arrow Articles by Grol, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geboers, H.
Right arrow Articles by Grol, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 13:391-397 (2001)
© 2001 International Society for Quality in Health Care

Continuous quality improvement in small general medical practices: the attitudes of general practitioners and other practice staff

Harrie Geboers, Henk Mokkink, Pauline Van Montfort, Henk Van Den Hoogen, Wil Van Den Bosch and Richard Grol

Center for Quality of Care Research (WOK), Department of General Medicine, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Objectives. Continuous quality improvement (CQI) offers opportunities to improve care in small-scale office-based practice. Little is yet known about the implementation of CQI in small primary care practices. We studied the attitudes of physicians and staff in small family practices to a model of CQI tailored to office-based practice setting.

Practices and design. An exploratory study in 20 family practices in The Netherlands. Practices were stimulated to adopt the model for continuous quality improvement.

Main outcome measures. The use of the model at the end of the study period, the perception of the physicians and staff of their success with adopting the model, their view of its usefulness, their willingness to continue and personal and practical obstacles. Measurements were made using written questionnaires.

Results. The rate of implementation of the model varied between practices. Participants rated their success in performing improvement projects, holding regular quality meetings and setting targets and priorities. They were positive about the usefulness of the model and they were generally willing to continue to use it. Barriers included the size of workload and the tendency to postpone actions until external support by an outreach visitor was provided. Physician and staff attitudes were homogeneous at a practice level.

Conclusion. Our findings stress the importance of starting CQI with small, easy-to-handle projects. Workload reduction might be an important issue to focus on. Personal obstacles should be addressed throughout the introduction. We found attitudes in small-scale practices to be homogeneous, so that it was important to pay explicit attention to commitment to CQI from the start of the introduction.

Keywords: attitude to CQI, CQI, family practice, implementation of CQI, opinion of CQI


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. H. Ting, K. G. Shojania, V. M. Montori, and E. H. Bradley
Quality Improvement: Science and Action
Circulation, April 14, 2009; 119(14): 1962 - 1974.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
G. Warner, M.-L. Drainoni, V. Parker, B. D. Agins, and L. Eldred
Factors Associated with the Successful Implementation of a Quality Improvement Project in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Ambulatory Care Clinics
American Journal of Medical Quality, March 1, 2004; 19(2): 75 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
E. Hudon, M.-D. Beaulieu, and D. Roberge
Integration of the recommendations of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care: Obstacles perceived by a group of family physicians
Fam. Pract., February 1, 2004; 21(1): 11 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.