Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by IEZZONI, L. I.
Right arrow Articles by O’DAY, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by IEZZONI, L. I.
Right arrow Articles by O’DAY, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 14:369-381 (2002)
© 2002 International Society for Quality in Health Care


Paper

Satisfaction with quality and access to health care among people with disabling conditions

LISA I. IEZZONI1, ROGER B. DAVIS1, JANE SOUKUP1 and BONNIE O’DAY2

1Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, the Charles A. Dana Research Institute and the Harvard-Thorndike Laboratory, Boston, MA
2Cherry Engineering Support Services, Inc., McLean, VA, USA

Objective. To compare satisfaction with health care between persons with and without disabling conditions.

Design. Responses to 1996 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey.

Setting. Nationally representative of the United States population.

Study participants. Community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries, older and younger than 65 years (n = 16 403).

Main outcome measure. Adjusted odds of being dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with five general quality measures and five access-to-care measures by five disabling conditions (blind or low vision, deaf or hard of hearing, difficulty walking, difficulty reaching, manual dexterity difficulties). Multivariable logistic regressions on dissatisfaction adjusted for age group, sex, disabling condition, race, ethnicity, urban versus rural residence, education, household income <$25 000 versus >=$25 000, having a usual source of care, proxy respondent, and managed care.

Results. Of an estimated 33.58 million non-institutionalized Medicare beneficiaries, 64.1% (estimated 21.51 million) reported at least one disabling condition. Among younger beneficiaries, 10.4% with any major disability were dissatisfied with their care overall, as were 4.6% without disabilities. Nevertheless, persons with disabilities generally had significantly higher adjusted odds of dissatisfaction. For elderly persons with any major disability, the adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of dissatisfaction were: 3.2 (2.4–4.3) for overall quality; 3.2 (2.2–4.6) for access to specialists; 4.4 (3.1–6.4) for follow-up; and 4.2 (3.1–5.7) for ease of getting to doctors. Elderly managed care enrollees were less satisfied with access to specialists, but more satisfied with costs.

Conclusion. The quality domains generating the greatest dissatisfaction were anticipated, given the nature of disabling conditions. Improving these areas requires attention inside and outside the health care system. Redesigning practice settings and procedures, and changing payment policies offer the only solutions to some problems.

Keywords: access, blind, deaf, disability, mobility impaired, quality, satisfaction


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
S. L. Minden, D. C. Hoaglin, L. Hadden, D. Frankel, T. Robbins, and J. Perloff
Access to and utilization of neurologists by people with multiple sclerosis
Neurology, March 25, 2008; 70(13_Part_2): 1141 - 1149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Disability Policy StudiesHome page
S. S. Bachman, C. Tobias, R. J. Master, J. Scavron, and K. Tierney
A Managed Care Model for Latino Adults With Chronic Illness and Disability: Results of the Brightwood Health Center Intervention
Journal of Disability Policy Studies, March 1, 2008; 18(4): 197 - 204.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
S.L. Minden, D. Frankel, L. Hadden, and D.C. Hoaglin
Access to health care for people with multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, May 1, 2007; 13(4): 547 - 558.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
M. R. Niefeld and J. D. Kasper
Access to Ambulatory Medical and Long-Term Care Services Among Elderly Medicare and Medicaid Beneficiaries: Organizational, Financial, and Geographic Barriers
Med Care Res Rev, June 1, 2005; 62(3): 300 - 319.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
T. V. Perneger
Adjustment for patient characteristics in satisfaction surveys
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2004; 16(6): 433 - 435.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
B. L. O'Day, M. Killeen, and L. I. Iezzoni
Improving Health Care Experiences of Persons Who Are Blind or Have Low Vision: Suggestions From Focus Groups
American Journal of Medical Quality, September 1, 2004; 19(5): 193 - 200.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
L. I. Iezzoni, B. L. O'Day, M. Killeen, and H. Harker
Communicating about Health Care: Observations from Persons Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing
Ann Intern Med, March 2, 2004; 140(5): 356 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
L. I. Iezzoni
Targeting health care improvement for persons with disabilities
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2003; 15(4): 279 - 281.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.