International Journal for Quality in Health Care 15:377-398 (2003)
© 2003 International Society for Quality in Health Care
Policy Roundtable |
Conceptual frameworks for health systems performance: a quest for effectiveness, quality, and improvement
1 Netherlands Institute for Health Sciences, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam and 2 Department of Social Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Issues. Countries and international organizations have recently renewed their interest in how health systems perform. This has led to the development of performance indicators for monitoring, assessing, and managing health systems to achieve effectiveness, equity, efficiency, and quality. Although the indicators populate conceptual frameworks, it is often not very clear just what the underlying concepts might be or how effectiveness is conceptualized and measured. Furthermore, there is a gap in the knowledge of how the resultant performance data are used to stimulate improvement and to ensure health care quality.
Addressing the issues. This paper therefore explores, individually, the conceptual bases, effectiveness and its indicators, as well as the quality improvement dynamics of the performance frameworks of the UK, Canada, Australia, US, World Health Organization, and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Results. We see that they all conceive health and health system performance in one or more supportive frameworks, but differ in concepts and operations. Effectiveness often implies, nationally, the achievement of high quality outcomes of care, or internationally, the efficient achievement of system objectives, or both. Its indicators are therefore mainly outcome and, less so, process measures. The frameworks are linked to a combination of tools and initiatives to stimulate and manage performance and quality improvement.
Conclusions. These dynamics may ensure the proper environment for these conceptual frameworks where, alongside objectives such as equity and efficiency, effectiveness (therefore, quality) becomes the core of health systems performance.
Keywords: conceptual framework, effectiveness, health system performance, performance indicator, performance management, performance measurement, quality
Address reprint requests to Dr Onyebuchi A. Arah, Department of Social Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam 1100 DD, The Netherlands. E-mail: oacarah{at}yahoo.com
Accepted for publication March 31, 2003.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Shipton, C. Armstrong, M. West, and J. Dawson The impact of leadership and quality climate on hospital performance Int. J. Qual. Health Care, September 10, 2008; (2008) mzn037v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Profit, J. A. F. Zupancic, J. B. Gould, and L. A. Petersen Implementing Pay-for-Performance in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Pediatrics, May 1, 2007; 119(5): 975 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Kelley Health, spending and the effort to improve quality in OECD countries: a review of the data The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, March 1, 2007; 127(2): 64 - 71. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Holmberg Task uncertainty and rationality in medical problem solving Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2006; 18(6): 458 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. A. Arah, G. P. Westert, J. Hurst, and N. S. Klazinga A conceptual framework for the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project Int. J. Qual. Health Care, September 1, 2006; 18(suppl_1): 5 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Nolte, C. Bain, and M. McKee Diabetes as a Tracer Condition in International Benchmarking of Health Systems Diabetes Care, May 1, 2006; 29(5): 1007 - 1011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O A Arah and N S Klazinga How safe is the safety paradigm? Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2004; 13(3): 226 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|