Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Runciman, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Runciman, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 15:i49-i59 (2003)
© 2003 International Society for Quality in Health Care

Adverse drug events and medication errors in Australia

William B. Runciman1,2, Elizabeth E. Roughead3, Susan J. Semple3 and Robert J. Adams4

1 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Adelaide,
2 Australian Patient Safety Foundation, Adelaide,
3 Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, School of Pharmaceutical, Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide,
4 Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Australia

Purpose. To review information about adverse drug events (ADEs) and medication errors in Australia.

Data sources. Systematic literature reviews and reports from data collections of the Australian Bureau of Statistics, Institute of Health and Welfare, Council for Health Care Standards and Patient Safety Foundation.

Results (medical record reviews): We have shown that 2–4% of all hospital admissions, and up to 30% for patients > 75 years of age, are medication-related; up to three-quarters are potentially preventable.

Results (routine data collections): Routine death certificate and hospital discharge data coded using the International Classification of Diseases capture less than half as many ADEs as medical record reviews. Of coded adverse events that contributed to death, 27% involved an ADE, as did 20% of adverse events identified at discharge and 43% at general practice encounters. There is a strong correlation between increases in medication use and rates of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with hospitalization.

Results (drugs implicated): These were similar in all the above studies: anticoagulants, anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, anti­neoplastics, antihypertensives, antibiotics, cardiac glycosides, diuretics, hypoglycaemic agents, steroids, hypnotics, anticonvulsants, and antipsychotics.

Results (clinical indicators): An ADE is reported in 1% of hospital admissions, while some hospitals do not report ADRs to the national collection. Only three-quarters of patients with acute myocardial infarction receive thrombolytics within 1 hour of presentation. Five per cent of patients on warfarin record an international normalized ratio > 5, and 1%, 0.05%, and 0.2% ­suffer abnormal bleeding, cerebral haemorrhage, or death, respectively.

Results (the Australian Incident Monitoring System): Twenty-six per cent of 27 000 hospital-related incidents were medication-related, as were 36% of 2000 anaesthesia-related incidents, and 50% of 2500 general practice incidents.

Results (errors): Errors occur in 15–20% of drug administrations when ward stock systems are used and 5–8% when individual patient systems are used. Previous allergic reactions to drugs may not be recorded more than 75% of the time.

Conclusion. ADEs are common in the Australian health system. Anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory, and cardiovascular drugs feature prominently as preventable, high impact problems, and collectively make up over one-half of all ADEs. Methods for monitoring and preventing ADEs should be progressively improved.

Keywords: adverse drug events, adverse drug reactions, clinical indicators, incident monitoring, medication errors

Accepted for publication August 14, 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
E. Manias, C. J Beanland, R. G Riley, and A. M Hutchinson
Development and Validation of the Self-Administration of Medication Tool
Ann. Pharmacother., June 1, 2006; 40(6): 1064 - 1073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
A Cleopas, A Villaveces, A Charvet, P A Bovier, V Kolly, and T V Perneger
Patient assessments of a hypothetical medical error: effects of health outcome, disclosure, and staff responsiveness.
Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 136 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
A D Paix, M F Bullock, W B Runciman, and J A Williamson
Crisis management during anaesthesia: problems associated with drug administration during anaesthesia
Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2005; 14(3): e15 - e15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.