Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Geppert, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baker, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Geppert, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 16:19-30 (2004)
© International Society for Quality in Health Care and Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Do health plans influence quality of care?

Laurence C. Baker1,2,6, David Hopkins1,3, Richard Dixon4, Jeffrey Rideout5 and Jeffrey Geppert2,6

1 Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA,
2 National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA,
3 Pacific Business Group on Health, San Francisco, CA,
4 RLA Technologies, Jackson, CA,
5 Blue Shield of California Foundation, San Francisco, CA,
6 Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

Objective. To investigate the relative impact of physician groups and health plans on quality of care measures.

Design. Secondary data analysis of receipt of preventive care services included in the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) among 10 758 patients representing 21 health maintenance organizations and 22 large provider groups in the SanFrancisco and Los Angeles, California, areas in 1997. Each patient was eligible for (at least) one of six HEDIS-measured services. Data identify whether or not the service was provided, the patient’s health plan, and the provider group responsible for the care. We used logistic regression to examine variations across plans in HEDIS rates, and whether variations persist after controls for provider groups are included.

Setting. Patients from 21 health maintenance organizations serving San Francisco and Los Angeles, California, in 1997.

Main outcome measures. Breast cancer screening, childhood immunizations, cervical cancer screening, diabetic retinal exam, prenatal care in the first trimester, and check-ups after delivery among patients for whom these services are appropriate.

Results. There are statistically significant differences across health plans in utilization rates for the six services examined. These differences are not substantially affected when we control for the provider group that cared for the patient. That is, controlling for provider group does not explain variations across plans, consistent with the view that health plans have an impact on HEDIS quality measures independent of the providers that they contract with.

Conclusions. There are activities that plans can undertake which influence their HEDIS scores. On the face of it, these results suggest that plans can independently improve quality, in contrast to hypotheses that plans would be ‘too far’ from patients to have an influence. Continued attention to collecting plan-level data is warranted. Further work should address other possible sources of variations in HEDIS scores, such as variability in the quality of plan administrative databases.

Keywords: health plans, HEDIS scores, preventive care, provider groups, quality

Accepted for publication September 24, 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
D. O. Francis, H. Beckman, J. Chamberlain, G. Partridge, and R. A. Greene
Introducing a Multifaceted Intervention to Improve the Management of Otitis Media: How Do Pediatricians, Internists, and Family Physicians Respond?
American Journal of Medical Quality, March 1, 2006; 21(2): 134 - 143.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. N. Trivedi, A. M. Zaslavsky, E. C. Schneider, and J. Z. Ayanian
Trends in the Quality of Care and Racial Disparities in Medicare Managed Care
N. Engl. J. Med., August 18, 2005; 353(7): 692 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
W. E. Golden
Should health plans be accountable for clinical performance measures?
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, February 1, 2004; 16(1): 7 - 8.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.