International Journal for Quality in Health Care 16:141-148 (2004)
International Journal for Quality in Health Care vol. 16 no. 2 © International Society for Quality in Health Care and Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved
Repeated measurements of generic indicators: a Danish national program to benchmark and improve quality of care
1 The Good Medical Department Program and
2 Medical Centre, Amager University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
Objective. To measure performance on the basis of generic (non-diagnoses related) standards of care developed in a national Danish quality improvement programme in departments of internal medicine, and to determine the power of repetitive national audits to increase levels of performance.
Design. Multifaceted intervention: national audits in 2001 and 2002 based on the standards of the program, combined with direct contact with heads of departments and a national conference to discuss audit results.
Setting. Seventy-nine and 82 wards in 2001 and 2002, respectively, covering 71% of Danish hospitals receiving medical emergencies. The wards participated on a voluntary basis.
Participants. In the first audit round, 3950 patients were admitted as emergencies, while 4068 patients were admitted as emergencies in the second audit. Patients were included without reference to diagnoses.
Main outcome measures. Correct initial diagnostic assessment, early interdisciplinary action plans, correct drug prescriptions, waiting times for examinations, documented patient information, readmissions, and content and processing time for discharge letters.
Results. For the 70 wards participating in both rounds, the general level of performance improved significantly between the two audits: the proportion of patients with correct initial diagnostic assessment increased from 75.9% to 79.4%, the proportion of patients with correct drug prescriptions increased from 83.8% to 85.9%, and the proportion of sufficiently informed patients increased from 32.4% to 36.2% (P < 0.05). The proportion of medical records containing action plans for selected clinical problems (nutritional and functional problems, fever, and treatment of pain) increased from 72.8% to 75.9% (P < 0.05). Length of stay in hospital was significantly related to a correct initial assessment and to waiting time for examinations. Wards with a common medication chart for physicians and nurses had significantly more correct drug prescriptions than wards that did not use a medication chart. Fifty-four (75%) of the participating departments indicated that the result of the first audit round had led to organizational changes in the department.
Conclusion. Professional self-regulation guided by a multidisciplinary audit tool developed in cooperation with professionals can improve quality of care. It is possible to conduct and repeat a national audit on a voluntary basis.
Keywords: clinical audit, internal medicine, performance indicators, benchmarking
Address reprint requests to Peter Qvist, The Good Medical Department Program, Amager University Hospital, Hans Bogbinders Allé 3, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark. E-mail: info{at}dgma.dk
Accepted for publication December 4, 2003.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Kripalani, F. LeFevre, C. O. Phillips, M. V. Williams, P. Basaviah, and D. W. Baker Deficits in Communication and Information Transfer Between Hospital-Based and Primary Care Physicians: Implications for Patient Safety and Continuity of Care JAMA, February 28, 2007; 297(8): 831 - 841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|