Skip Navigation

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2004 16(5):367-373; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzh066
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sekimoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fukui, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sekimoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fukui, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care vol. 16 no. 5 © International Society for Quality in Health Care and Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Practice variation in perioperative antibiotic use in Japan

Miho Sekimoto, Yuichi Imanaka, Edward Evans, Tatsuro Ishizaki, Masahiro Hirose, Kenshi Hayashida and Tsuguya Fukui1

Department of Healthcare Economics and Quality Management and 1 Department of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Konoe-cho, Yoshida, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan

Objectives. Under the fee-for-service system, the overuse and misuse of perioperative antibiotics have become serious concerns in Japan. The objective of the present study is to investigate practice variations of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis between and within hospitals, and to identify any opportunities for improvement.

Methods. We polled 319 surgeons in six specialties employed by 11 teaching hospitals in Japan. We developed questionnaires with vignettes, asking physicians about their practice of antimicrobial prophylaxis in six surgical procedures (gastrectomy, hysterectomy, cataract surgery, clipping of cerebral aneurysm, hip fracture surgery, and coronary artery bypass graft) and utilization of institutional clinical pathways.

Results. Average durations of prophylaxis varied by procedure, from 1.6 days for cataract surgery to 5.8 days for clipping surgery. Variation was also observed between institutions for the same procedure, e.g. institutional averages for the duration of prophylaxis for gastrectomy ranged from 2.3 to 7 days. Large intra-institutional variation in prophylaxis duration and inconsistent use of clinical pathways were observed in the cases of gastrectomy, hip fracture surgery, and clipping surgery. At one hospital, 20% of physicians performing gastrectomy indicated the use of an institutional clinical pathway, and prophylaxis duration ranged from 3 to 6 days. For cataract surgery and hysterectomy, clinical pathways were universally applied and intra-institutional practice variation was small, yet prophylaxis duration varied widely between hospitals and third-generation cephalosporins were used extensively. Average length of prophylaxis for hysterectomy ranged from 1.8 to 6 days and 43% of respondents prescribed third-generation cephalosporins.

Conclusions. In Japan, perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis lacks standardization. Efforts to strengthen an evidence-based approach to antimicrobial prophylaxis need to be made a priority at both the national and institutional levels.

Keywords: antibiotic prophylaxis, critical pathways, guideline adherence, perioperative care, physician practice patterns

Address reprint requests to Yuichi Imanaka, Department of Healthcare Economics and Quality Management, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Konoe-cho, Yoshida, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan. E-mail: imanaka{at}pbh.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Accepted for publication June 4, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.