Skip Navigation

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2004 16(6):437-445; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzh072
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, H.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Laditka, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lin, H.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Laditka, J. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care vol. 16 no. 6 © International Society for Quality in Health Care and Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Patient perceptions of service quality in group versus solo practice clinics

Herng-Ching Lin1, Sudha Xirasagar2 and James N. Laditka2

1 Taipei Medical University, School of Health Care Administration, Taipei, Taiwan, 2 University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, USA

Objective. To compare patient perceptions of service quality at solo and group practices, and to examine the association of perceptions with ‘potential patient loyalty’ (PPL), the potential for seeking future service from the same clinic.

Design. A self-administered, cross-sectional survey of clinic outpatients, using an adapted SERVQUAL questionnaire translated into Chinese, with additional items on overall satisfaction and intent to return/recommend the clinic to others.

Sampling and study subjects. Every third outpatient at all newly started group practices (four) and solo clinics (thirteen) in Taiwan in the preceding 4–7 months, including 150 and 50 patients from each group and solo practice, respectively, for a total of 1250 patients.

Main outcome measures. Perceived service quality on five dimensions—tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy—and PPL. All constructs were measured on a five-point scale.

Results. After accounting for random effects of clinical and geographical location, group practice patients perceived significantly higher service quality on all dimensions relative to solo practice patients, after adjusting for age, gender, education, and illness type. All service quality dimensions except assurance were significantly positively associated with PPL after adjusting for age, gender, education, and illness type, and random effects at the clinical and geographical location levels.

Conclusions. Patients perceive better service quality at group practices compared with solo practices on all dimensions. Patients’ quality perceptions are significant predictors of PPL. The implications for physician practices both internationally and in Taiwan are discussed, as well as policy implications for the Taiwan government.

Keywords: group practice, patient satisfaction, potential patient loyalty, service quality

Address reprint requests to Herng-Ching Lin, Taipei Medical University, School of Health Care Administration, Taipei, Taiwan. E-mail: henry11111{at}tmu.edu.tw

Accepted for publication June 21, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Policy PlanHome page
S. Xirasagar, H.-C. Lin, and T.-C. Liu
Do group practices have lower caesarean rates than solo practice obstetric clinics? Evidence from Taiwan.
Health Policy Plan., July 1, 2006; 21(4): 319 - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
T. V. Perneger
Adjustment for patient characteristics in satisfaction surveys
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2004; 16(6): 433 - 435.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.