Skip Navigation

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2004 16(6):517-521; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzh085
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stark, A.
Right arrow Articles by Griggs, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stark, A.
Right arrow Articles by Griggs, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care vol. 16 no. 6 © International Society for Quality in Health Care and Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Influence of health insurance status on inclusion of HER-2/neu testing in the diagnostic workup of breast cancer patients

Azadeh Stark1, Gena Kucera1, Mei Lu2, Sarah Claud1 and Jennifer Griggs3

1 Josephine Ford Cancer Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, 2 Department of Biostatistics and Research Epidemiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, 3 Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology and Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, University of Rochester, NY, USA

Objectives. To assess the prevalence of HER-2/neu testing in a community-based health care system shortly after the approval of several laboratory kits for HER-2/neu testing for diagnostic purposes by the US Food and Drug Administration and to discern the best discriminating variables for inclusion of the test in the diagnostic workup of breast cancer patients.

Design. A retrospective cross-sectional study was designed to analyze data for the period beginning 1 January 1999 and ending 31 December 2000.

Setting. Henry Ford Health System, the largest health care system in southeastern Michigan, is a comprehensive, self-contained system.

Study participants. Four hundred and fifty-one women diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancers were consecutively sampled from the tumor registry of the Henry Ford Health System.

Results. The proportion of women tested for HER-2/neu increased by 2-fold during year 2 of the observation. Absence of estrogen receptors (OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.15–3.21), physicians with specialty in surgery (OR = 6.21, 95% CI 2.88–13.33, P = 0.0001), and having a capitated insurance (OR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.06–2.44, P = 0.027) were associated with HER-2/neu testing.

Conclusion. Absence of estrogen receptors was the only pathological characteristic associated with HER-2/neu testing. The effect of specialization in surgery on the increased likelihood of HER-2/neu testing can be explained mostly by the ‘patient volume effect’. The observed disparity in the delivery of innovative diagnostic approaches to cancer patients was influenced by the type of health insurance. Implementation of institutional policies can improve in providing universal quality of care for all patients regardless of their health insurance.

Keywords: biomarker, breast cancer, health insurance, HER-2/neu

Address reprint requests to Azadeh Stark, Henry Ford Health System, Josephine Ford Cancer Center, One Ford Place, 5C, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. E-mail: astark1{at}hfhs.org

Accepted for publication August 13, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
K. A. Phillips
Closing the Evidence Gap in the Use of Emerging Testing Technologies in Clinical Practice
JAMA, December 3, 2008; 300(21): 2542 - 2544.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.