International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on February 21, 2005
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2005 17(2):173-176; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzi022
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undertreatment of acute pain in the emergency department: a challenge
1 Emergency Department, Hadassah University Hospital Mount Scopus, Jerusalem, 2 Center for Quality and Safety, Hadassah University Hospital Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel
Objective. Evaluation and improvement of pain management in our emergency department (ED).
Design. This was a ‘before–after’ study. For each subject, the nurse, the physician, and the patient were asked to rate the initial intensity of the pain on a Visual Analogue Score (VAS). The timing and the type of analgesics administered were then recorded and follow-up VAS was performed.
Setting. A teaching, community-based, 400-bed hospital.
Study participants. 140 patients admitted for acute pain related to orthopedic injuries.
Main outcome measures. The gap between the VAS expressed by the patient and estimated by the staff, the proportion of patients receiving analgesics, and the length of time delays between admission and analgesic administration.
Intervention. The intervention included education of medical and nursing staffs, insertion of a VAS template in the patient’s chart, initiation of routine VAS assessment and re-assessment, and implementation of a protocol for pain management with standing orders for nurses.
Results. The VAS gap between the patient and the nurse decreased significantly from 1.91 2.04 to 1.03 1.97 after the intervention (P = 0.01). The percentage of patients receiving analgesics rose from 70 to 82% following the intervention. Time from admission to analgesia decreased from 80 ± 68 min (mean ± SD) before the intervention, to 58 ± 37 min after the intervention (P = 0.05).
Conclusion. Inadequate pain management in the ED appears related to poor staff assessment of pain and may be improved by routine VAS recording and by a nurse-based pain protocol.
Keywords: emergency department, pain, visual analogue score
Address reprint requests to Ruth Stalnikowicz, Emergency Department, Hadassah University Hospital Mount Scopus, PO Box 24035, Jerusalem 91240, Israel. E-mail: darvasi{at}md.huji.ac.il
Accepted for publication December 2, 2004.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. M. Rouleau, D. E. Feldman, and S. Parent Delay to orthopedic consultation for isolated limb injury: Cross-sectional survey in a level 1 trauma centre Can Fam Physician, October 1, 2009; 55(10): 1006 - 1007.e5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Junod Perron, V. Piguet, and P.A. Bovier Long-term effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention on pain management in a walk-in clinic QJM, April 1, 2007; 100(4): 225 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|