Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on April 14, 2005
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2005 17(3):193-201; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzi037
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/3/193    most recent
mzi037v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nabitz, U.
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nabitz, U.
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care vol. 17 no. 3 © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

Using Concept Mapping to design an indicator framework for addiction treatment centres

Udo Nabitz1, Wim van Den Brink2 and Paul Jansen3

1 Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2 University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3 Free University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Objective. The objective of this study is to determine an indicator framework for addiction treatment centres based on the demands of stakeholders and in alignment with the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) Excellence Model.

Setting. The setting is the Jellinek Centre based in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, which serves as a prototype for an addiction treatment centre.

Method. Concept mapping was used in the construction of the indicator framework. During the 1-day workshop, 16 stakeholders generated, prioritized and sorted 73 items concerning quality and performance. Multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis was applied in constructing a framework consisting of two dimensions and eight clusters.

Results. The horizontal axis of the indicator framework is named ‘Organization’ and has two poles, namely, ‘Processes’ and ‘Results’. The vertical axis is named ‘ Task’ and the poles are named ‘Efficient treatment’ and ‘Prevention programs’. The eight clusters in the two-dimensional framework are arranged in the following, prioritized sequence: ‘Efficient treatment network’, ‘Effective service’, ‘ Target group’, ‘Quality of life’, ‘Efficient service’, ‘Knowledge transfer’, ‘Reducing addiction related problems’, and ‘Prevention programs’. The most important items in the framework are: ‘patients are satisfied with their treatment’, ‘early interventions’, and ‘efficient treatment chain’.

Conclusion. The indicator framework aligns with three clusters of the results criteria of the EFQM Excellence Model. It is based on the stakeholders’ perspectives and is believed to be specific for addiction treatment centres. The study demonstrates that concept mapping is a suitable strategy for generating indicator frameworks.

Keywords: addiction treatment centres, concept mapping, consensus procedure, EFQM, health care policy, performance indicators, quality indicators, total quality management

Address reprint requests to U. W. Nabitz, Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research, Post Box 3907, 1001 AS Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: unabitz{at}jellinek.nl

Accepted for publication February 3, 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
M. Minkman, K. Ahaus, I. Fabbricotti, U. Nabitz, and R. Huijsman
A quality management model for integrated care: results of a Delphi and Concept Mapping study
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, February 1, 2009; 21(1): 66 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The GerontologistHome page
A. S. Groenewoud, MSc, N. J. A. van Exel, MSc, M. Berg, PhD, and R. Huijsman, PhD
Building Quality Report Cards for Geriatric Care in The Netherlands: Using Concept Mapping to Identify the Appropriate "Building Blocks" From the Consumer's Perspective
Gerontologist, February 1, 2008; 48(1): 79 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
O. A. Arah, G. P. Westert, J. Hurst, and N. S. Klazinga
A conceptual framework for the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, September 1, 2006; 18(suppl_1): 5 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
R. W. Gibberd
Performance measurement: is it now more scientific?
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, June 1, 2005; 17(3): 185 - 186.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.