International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on March 2, 2005
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2005 17(3):235-242; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzi027
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A systematic review of appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: multiple similarities and one common deficit
1 Belgian Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Leuven, Belgium 2 Catholic University Leuven, Centre for Health Services and Nursing Research, Leuven, Belgium 3 Catholic University Leuven, Academic Centre for General Practice, Leuven, Belgium, and 4 Belgian Federal Health Care Knowledge Centre, Brussels, Belgium
Objective. To identify a critical appraisal tool for clinical practice guidelines that could serve as a basis for the development of an appraisal tool for clinical pathways.
Design. Systematic review of the literature and personal contacts. Databases searched were: Medline, Embase, and Cinahl. Search terms were: practice guidelines, appraisal, and evaluation. The items of the identified appraisal tools were examined and thematically grouped into 10 guideline dimensions. Content analysis and scoring of these domains by the appraisal tools was evaluated.
Results. Twenty-four different appraisal tools of practice guidelines were identified. None scored the evidence base of the clinical content of guidelines. Four tools scored all the guideline dimensions. The Cluzeau instrument is the only one of these four that has been validated. Of the three instruments based on the Cluzeau instrument, the AGREE instrument is the only validated instrument that uses a numerical scale.
Conclusions. Being a simplified version of the Cluzeau instrument, the AGREE instrument has the most potential to serve as a basis for the development of an appraisal tool for clinical pathways. However, important limitations will have to be dealt with when developing such a tool.
Keywords: appraisal tool, clinical pathways, content analysis, practice guidelines
Address reprint requests to Joan Vlayen, Centre for Health Services and Nursing Research, Kapucijnenvoer 35, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. E-mail: joan.vlayen{at}med.kuleuven.ac.be
Accepted for publication January 5, 2005.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K M Hill and E E Lalor How useful is an online tool to facilitate guideline implementation? Feasibility study of using eGLIA by stroke clinicians in Australia Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2009; 18(2): 157 - 159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Nagy, J. Watine, P. S. Bunting, R. Onody, W. P. Oosterhuis, D. Rogic, S. Sandberg, K. Boda, and A. R. Horvath Do Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Diabetes Mellitus Fulfill the Criteria of Evidence-Based Guideline Development? Clin. Chem., November 1, 2008; 54(11): 1872 - 1882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. Burgers Guideline Quality and Guideline Content: Are They Related? Clin. Chem., January 1, 2006; 52(1): 3 - 4. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Watine, B. Friedberg, E. Nagy, R. Onody, W. Oosterhuis, P. S. Bunting, J.-C. Charet, and A. R. Horvath Conflict between Guideline Methodologic Quality and Recommendation Validity: A Potential Problem for Practitioners Clin. Chem., January 1, 2006; 52(1): 65 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|