International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on January 5, 2006
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2006 18(2):145-151; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzi094
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review Article
Implementation of a pre-dialysis clinical pathway for patients with chronic kidney disease
Melbourne Health, North West Dialysis Service, Parkville, Australia
Objective. The objective of this study was to design and implement an efficient pathway to ensure a smooth transition of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease to dialysis.
Setting. In our dialysis service, as elsewhere, we recognized that there was an unacceptably high rate of inadequately prepared patients commencing dialysis. Knowledge of clinical practice and research-based guidelines has not in itself changed clinical practice and patient management.
Main measures. To address these problems, multidisciplinary process redesign teams reviewed pre-existing arrangements by assessing current practice. The review identified critical points where problems could occur: failure to notify patients to dialysis service, late referral for vascular surgery, and inadequate pre-dialysis education. As a result of this process, we have formulated a modified and coordinated pre-dialysis programme.
Results. In association with process redesign, the proportion of patients registered ‘late’ decreased from 29% in July–September 2000 (pre-implementation) to 6% in January–March 2004 (P < 0.01) with the corresponding median time from registration to commencement of dialysis increasing from <1 month to 14 months (P < 0.01). Patients not registered with the service decreased from 57 to 0% (P < 0.001). Eighty-three per cent of patients commenced dialysis with a permanent vascular access in January–March 2004, compared with 24% in July–September 2000 (P < 0.001).
Conclusions. Through process redesign, more of our patients are known to us before commencement of dialysis, a greater proportion of which are provided with pre-dialysis education and permanent vascular access. Our results highlight that implementation remains the final and most difficult challenge of the guideline process.
Keywords: chronic kidney disease, dialysis, evidence-based care, guideline implementation, referral
Address reprint requests to Julie E. Owen, North West Dialysis Service, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville Vic. 3050, Australia. E-mail: julie.owen{at}mh.org.au
Accepted for publication November 10, 2005.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. Baer, N. Lameire, and W. Van Biesen Late referral of patients with end-stage renal disease: an in-depth review and suggestions for further actions NDT Plus, April 29, 2009; (2009) sfp050v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. J. Veazie An individual-based framework for the study of medical error Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2006; 18(4): 314 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|