Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on September 26, 2006
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2006 18(6):422-428; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzl050
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/6/422    most recent
mzl050v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oja, P. I.
Right arrow Articles by Pakarinen, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oja, P. I.
Right arrow Articles by Pakarinen, A. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care vol. 18 no. 6 © The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

From customer satisfaction survey to corrective actions in laboratory services in a university hospital

Paula I. Oja1,2, Timo T. Kouri1,2 and Arto J. Pakarinen1,2

1 Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Oulu and 2 Laboratory, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland

Objective. To find out the satisfaction of clinical units with laboratory services in a university hospital, to point out the most important problems and defects in services, to carry out corrective actions, and thereafter to identify the possible changes in satisfaction.

Setting and study participants. Senior physicians and nurses-in-charge of the clinical units at Oulu University Hospital, Finland.

Design. Customer satisfaction survey using a questionnaire was carried out in 2001, indicating the essential aspects of laboratory services. Customer-specific problems were clarified, corrective actions were performed, and the survey was repeated in 2004.

Results. In 2001, the highest dissatisfaction rates were recorded for computerized test requesting and reporting, turnaround times of tests, and the schedule of phlebotomy rounds. The old laboratory information system was not amenable to major improvements, and it was renewed in 2004–05. Several clinical units perceived turnaround times to be long, because the tests were ordered as routine despite emergency needs. Instructions about stat requesting were given to these units. However, no changes were evident in the satisfaction level in the 2004 survey. Following negotiations with the clinics, phlebotomy rounds were re-scheduled. This resulted in a distinct increase in satisfaction in 2004.

Conclusions. Satisfaction survey is a screening tool that identifies topics of dissatisfaction. Without further clarifications, it is not possible to find out the specific problems of customers and to undertake targeted corrective actions. Customer-specific corrections are rarely seen as improvements in overall satisfaction rates.

Keywords: customer satisfaction, laboratory services, quality management, satisfaction survey

Address reprint requests to Paula I. Oja, Laboratory, Oulu University Hospital, PO Box 500, 90029 OYS, Finland. E-mail: paula.oja{at}ppshp.fi

Accepted for publication September 5, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.