The OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project: history and background
1 OECD, Health Policy Unit, Paris, France, 2 Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, and 3 University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Objective. To describe the background, history, and approach of the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators (HCQI) Project, an initiative to implement quality measures for international benchmarking of medical care at the health system level.
Method. The participating countries and international organizations selected five priority areas (cardiac care, diabetes, mental health, patient safety, and primary care/prevention) and developed a conceptual framework to guide the project. International expert panels were formed to identify clinically important, scientifically sound, and feasible measures based on a structured consensus process.
Results. The consensus process was successfully completed in all five priority areas leading to a recommendation of 86 indicators. Nine indicators were selected for diabetes, 12 for mental health, 17 for cardiac care, 21 for patient safety, and 27 for primary care and prevention.
Conclusions. The initial experience of the HCQI Project demonstrates that international consensus can be achieved in how to measure the quality of care in priority areas, suggesting substantial demand for and interest in comparative information at the health system level. However, much additional work remains necessary before the project can supply policymakers and researchers with ongoing, comprehensive, and reliable data on the quality of care in industrialized countries.
Keywords: international comparison, quality indicators, quality of care
Address reprint requests to Soeren Mattke, The RAND Corporation, 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 2220, USA. E-mail: mattke{at}rand.org
Accepted for publication May 24, 2006.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S Mattke When should measures be updated? Development of a conceptual framework for maintenance of quality-of-care measures Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2008; 17(3): 182 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. Groene, N. Klazinga, V. Kazandjian, P. Lombrail, and P. Bartels The World Health Organization Performance Assessment Tool for Quality Improvement in Hospitals (PATH): An Analysis of the Pilot Implementation in 37 Hospitals Int. J. Qual. Health Care, June 1, 2008; 20(3): 155 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|