Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on February 2, 2007
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2007 19(2):105-112; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzl073
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/2/105    most recent
mzl073v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morris, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morris, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

Patient, carer and staff experience of a hospital-based stroke service

Reg Morris, Olivia Payne and Anna Lambert

Bristol Clinical Psychology Training Programme, University of Plymouth, 29 Park Row, Bristol, BS1 5NB

Objective. Here, the aim is to study the experiences of patients, carers and staff throughout a hospital stroke care pathway.

Design. Focus groups of patients, carers and staff followed a semi-structured format to elucidate experiences. The groups were recorded, transcribed and subjected to thematic analysis. Analyses were verified by researchers and participants.

Results. Patients and carers produced four overlapping themes: ‘information’, ‘staff attitudes’, ‘availability of care/treatment’ and ‘considering the whole person in context’. The carers' group produced two additional themes: ‘accommodation of patients’ individual needs' and ‘burden of care’. Their experiences were complex and multi-faceted; positive views of the whole service co-existed with negative views of some aspects. The staff groups produced six themes: ‘specialist service’, ‘split service’, ‘availability of care’, ‘consistency of care’, ‘staff morale’ and ‘wish for change’. Positive views of the specialist service were tempered by problems with physical and professional separation, staff shortages and ‘hierarchical practice’ that reduced collective decision-making.

Conclusion. Some of the patients' and carers' perspectives have not been previously reported in the stroke literature, including a desire for individualized treatment, the consideration of wider, non-physical needs and the carers' sense of burden. In addition, the study revealed how staff, carers and patients viewed each other and the service and demonstrated the concordance of their perceptions. However, staff showed little insight into the users' need for information and negative experiences of care. In contrast with previous research, lack of emotional care, poor continuity of care and lack of staff knowledge and skills were not identified as problems.

Keywords: stroke, health care quality assessment, quality of health care

Address reprint request to Reg Morris, Clinical Psychology, 29 Park Row, Bristol, BS1 5NB. E-mail: reg.morris{at}bris.ac.uk

Accepted for publication December 9, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
K. Asplund, F. Jonsson, M. Eriksson, B. Stegmayr, P. Appelros, B. Norrving, A. Terent, K. H. Asberg, and for the Riks-Stroke Collaboration
Patient Dissatisfaction With Acute Stroke Care
Stroke, December 1, 2009; 40(12): 3851 - 3856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.