Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on June 10, 2007
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2007 19(4):210-216; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm019
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/4/210    most recent
mzm019v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haw, C.
Right arrow Articles by Dickens, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haw, C.
Right arrow Articles by Dickens, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

An observational study of medication administration errors in old-age psychiatric inpatients

Camilla Haw, Jean Stubbs and Geoff Dickens

St. Andrew's Hospital, Billing Road, Northampton, NN1 5DG, United Kingdom

Background. Relatively little is known about medication administration errors in mental health settings.

Objective. To investigate the frequency and nature of medication administration errors in old-age psychiatry. To assess the acceptability of the observational technique to nurse participants.

Method. Cross-sectional study technique using (i) direct observation, (ii) medication chart review and (iii) incident reports.

Setting. Two elderly long-stay wards in an independent UK psychiatric hospital.

Participants. Nine nurses administering medication at routine medication rounds.

Main outcome measures. Frequency, type and severity of directly observed medication administration errors compared with errors detected by retrospective chart review and incident reports.

Results. Using direct observation 369 errors in 1423 opportunities for errors (25.9%) were detected vs. chart review detected 148 errors and incident reports none. Most errors were of doubtful or minor severity. The pharmacist intervened on four occasions to prevent an error causing patient harm. The commonest errors observed were unauthorized tablet crushing or capsule opening (111/369, 30.1%), omission without a valid reason (100/369, 27.1%) and failure to record administration (87/369, 23.6%). Among the nurses observed, the error rate varied widely from no errors to one error in every two doses administered. Of the seven nurses who completed the post-observation questionnaire, all said they would be willing to be observed again.

Conclusion. Medication administration errors are common and mostly minor. Direct observation is a useful, sensitive method for detecting medication administration errors in psychiatry and detects many more errors than chart review or incident reports. The technique appeared to be acceptable to most of the nursing staff that were observed.

Keywords: administration, adverse drug events, elderly, medication errors, mental health, observation, psychiatry

Address reprint requests to: Dr. Camilla Haw, St. Andrew's Hospital, Billing Road, Northampton, NN1 5DG, United Kingdom. E-mail: chaw{at}standrew.co.uk

Accepted for publication April 13, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.