Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on September 12, 2007
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2007 19(6):358-367; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm045
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/6/358    most recent
mzm045v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cortoos, P.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Laekeman, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cortoos, P.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Laekeman, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

Implementing a hospital guideline on pneumonia: a semi-quantitative review

Pieter-Jan Cortoos1, Steven Simoens1, Willy Peetermans2, Ludo Willems3 and Gert Laekeman1

1 Research Centre for Pharmaceutical Care and Pharmaco-economics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
3 Hospital Pharmacy, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Background and objective. To quantify the impact of different guideline implementation interventions to improve treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in a hospital setting.

Methods. Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care specialized register, EMBASE and CINAHL.

Study selection. Hospital-based trials studying the effect of guidelines on compliance with care processes, clinical and/or economic outcomes in the treatment of CAP together with a description of their implementation interventions.

Data extraction. Two independent reviewers extracted and categorized utilized implementation interventions, assessed intensity of use and calculated changes for process of care variables, clinical and economical outcomes. Correlations between interventions and improvement of outcomes were assessed by means of Spearman's rho-test and Mann–Whitney U-test.

Results. In 27 included studies, educational meetings (21/27) and distribution of written material (14/27) were the two most used interventions. Most individual studies show positive overall results, but taken together, no significant relation between number or type of implementation interventions and improvement of outcomes could be detected. Only audit and feedback showed a significant negative influence on the improvement rate of length of stay (p = 0.003; n = 20).

Conclusion. Other hospital-specific factors are likely to have a higher impact on the rate of improvement than the implementation interventions alone. Describing which interventions are most successful is unlikely to be correct without taking these hospital-specific factors into account. Future research should focus on how to identify and define these factors and how to adapt the intervention to hospital-specific factors.

Keywords: guideline adherence, implementation, pneumonia

Address reprint requests to: Pieter-Jan Cortoos, PharmD, Research Centre for Pharmaceutical Care and Pharmaco-economics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Herestraat 49, O&N 2, PO 521, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. Tel: +32 (0) 16 330407. Fax: +32 (0) 16 323468. E-mail: pieterjan.cortoos{at}pharm.kuleuven.be

Accepted for publication August 17, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.