Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on December 23, 2007
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2008 20(2):105-114; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm071
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/2/105    most recent
mzm071v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jayasinghe, U. W.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jayasinghe, U. W.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, M. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

Chronically ill Australians' satisfaction with accessibility and patient-centredness

Upali W. Jayasinghe1, Judy Proudfoot1, Chris Holton2, Gawaine Powell Davies1, Cheryl Amoroso1, Tanya Bubner2, Justin Beilby3 and Mark F. Harris1

1 Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
2 Discipline of General Practice, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
3 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Objective. To evaluate the association of characteristics of patients and general practices with patient assessment of quality of care.

Design. Cross-sectional multi-practice study using the general practice assessment survey.

Settings. General practices in Australia.

Participants. Ninety-six general practices and 7505 chronic illness patients aged ≥18 years.

Main outcome measures. Access of care and patient-centredness.

Results. Two factors were identified in factor analysis: ‘Access of care’ and ‘Patient-centredness’. Multilevel regression analysis showed significant associations between patients' assessments and patient and practice characteristics. Patients from smaller practices (one to three general practitioners) reported better access to care compared with larger practices. Patients from urban areas were more satisfied with patient-centredness than those from rural areas. Self-reported health status and age had a positive and home ownership, employment and education, and patients from non-English-speaking countries a negative relationship with both scores. Females were more satisfied with patient-centredness.

Conclusions. Patient assessments of quality of care and patient-centredness were strongly associated with practice and patient characteristics. This has important implications for interpreting assessments of the quality of primary care, and for policy and practice measures designed to improve this.

Keywords: general practice assessment survey, patient satisfaction with accessibility and patient-centredness, patient and practice characteristics, factor analysis, multilevel regression model, assessment of quality of primary care

Address reprint requests to: Upali Jayasinghe, Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. E-mail: upali.jay{at}unsw.edu.au; upalij{at}optusnet.com.au

Accepted for publication November 22, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.