Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on May 20, 2008
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2008 20(4):271-276; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzn019
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/4/271    most recent
mzn019v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morris, Z. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gannon, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morris, Z. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gannon, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

Drug misuse treatment services in Scotland: predicting outcomes

Zoe Slote Morris1 and Maria Gannon2

1 Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
2 Centre for Drug Misuse Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Objective. To investigate which aspects of treatment satisfaction are the best predictors of improved health, improved mental health and achievement of abstinence in drug misuse treatment services.

Design. Data were collected as part of the Drug Outcome Research in Scotland study, a prospective cohort study designed to evaluate drug misuse treatment provided in Scotland. Data were collected using a structured interview. Participants were recruited between 1 October 2001 and 30 June 2002. Follow-up interviews were carried out ~8 months later. Logistic regression analysis is used to explore client satisfaction with treatment on outcomes, using the Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire (discussed in Marsden et al., Assessing client satisfaction with treatment for substance use problems and the development of the Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire (TPQ). Addict Res 2000;8:455–70).

Setting. Prison, residential and community facilities.

Participants. A total of 841 drug users starting a new episode of drug treatment in Scotland in 2000–01.

Interventions. Methadone, substitute drugs other than methadone, residential rehabilitation, residential detoxification and non-clinical.

Main outcome measures. Reported improvements in physical health, mental health and abstinence.

Results. Client satisfaction predicted positive outcomes, independent of treatment setting. Predicting abstinence and improved physical and mental health were the items: ‘I have received the help that I was looking for’ and ‘The staff have helped to motivate me to sort out my problems’.

Conclusions. Feeling that treatment is appropriate, finding staff motivating, and having enough time to sort out problems are important aspects of satisfaction with treatment among users of drug treatment services who achieved positive treatment outcomes. Services should seek to provide more individualized services based on understanding of individual client needs. This may require longer treatment periods and greater client involvement.

Keywords: addiction, patient-centred, patient satisfaction, quality

Address reprint requests to: Zoe Morris; Tel: +44-1223-339 609; Fax: +44 -1223-339 701; E-mail: zsm20{at}cam.ac.uk

Accepted for publication April 22, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.