Skip Navigation

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2009 21(2):103-111; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzp007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

Development of the Korean primary care assessment tool—measuring user experience: tests of data quality and measurement performance

Jae Ho Lee1, Yong-Jun Choi2, Nak Jin Sung3, Soo Young Kim4, Seol Hee Chung5, Jaiyong Kim2, Tae-Hee Jeon6, Hoon Ki Park7 for the Korean Primary Care Research Group

1 Family Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 505 Banpo-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-701
2 Social and Preventive Medicine, Hallym University, 39 Hallymdaehak-gil, Chuncheon, Gangwon-Do
3 Family Medicine, Dongguk University, Ilsan
4 Family Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul 137-701
5 Research Department, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Seoul
6 Family Medicine, Seoul Veterans Hospital, Seoul
7 Family Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea

Objectives. To develop a tool for assessing the performance of primary care services in South Korea from the patient's perspective and to test the validity of the tool under the conceptual framework of the recently developed definition of primary care in Korea.

Design. Item development for questionnaire and a cross-sectional survey for tool validation at 16 primary care clinics. All family physicians included in this study were required to have practiced at their current clinic for at least 2 years.

Participants. A nine expert panel was assembled for tool development and patients (or guardians) who had visited their primary care clinic on six or more occasions over a period of more than 6 months participated in the survey.

Main outcome measures. Scores corresponding to each domain of primary care.

Results. A total of 722 effective data sets were used for the analysis. Five items were eliminated from the preliminary 30-item tool after expert discussions at two seminars. Another four items were eliminated by principle component analysis. For each of the four domains (comprehensiveness, coordination function, personalized care, and family/community orientation), tests of scaling assumptions were well satisfied by all Likert-scaled measures. On the other hand, ‘first contact’ turned out to be a composite domain with five independent single-item scales.

Conclusion. The Korean primary care assessment tool (version 1) consists of four multi-item scales and one composite scale. Widespread application of this tool will provide an empirical basis for the measurement, monitoring and continuous improvement of primary care in South Korea.

Keywords: family medicine, health policy, Korea, primary care/general practice, public health, quality management, quality measurement, setting of care, surveys

Address reprint requests to: Jae Ho Lee, Family Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 505 Banpo-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-701, Korea. Tel: +82-10-6778-7808; Fax: +82-2-590-2968; E-mail: jaeholee{at}catholic.ac.kr

Accepted for publication February 1, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.