Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on March 26, 2009
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2009 21(3):176-182; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzp013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/3/176    most recent
mzp013v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schade, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Knowles, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schade, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Knowles, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

Impact of a national campaign on hospital readmissions in home care patients

Charles Price Schade1, Eve Esslinger2, Donna Anderson3, Yinghua Sun3 and Bethany Knowles1

1 West Virginia Medical Institute, 3001 Chesterfield Place, Charleston, WV 25304, USA
2 Quality Insights of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg, PA 17110, USA
3 Quality Insights of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, PA 15276, USA

Objective. Assess impact of nationwide home health quality improvement campaign to reduce acute care hospitalization of home health recipients.

Design. Observational pre–post comparison of self-selected participating and non-participating agencies' quality performance; survey to determine uptake of program materials.

Setting. US home health care agencies.

Participants. A total of 147 agencies with 147 non-participating agencies matched on patient length of service, pre-intervention hospitalization rate and pre-intervention rate of change in hospitalization rate.

Intervention(s). Public events; provision of educational packages and technical assistance; quality measure feedback.

Main outcome measure(s). Post-intervention difference in risk-adjusted acute care hospitalization rate between participants and non-participants; difference in self-reported campaign material use between agencies whose hospitalization rate declined 2% or more and those whose rates increased by 2% or more.

Results. Hospitalization rate had a negative trend beginning before the campaign. In the matched pairs studied, it did not differ significantly between participants and non-participants, or from pre- to post-intervention period (28% in every case). Agencies that improved were more likely to report activities consistent with the campaign and using campaign interventions than those not improving (P < 0.001), regardless of participation status.

Conclusions. Merely agreeing to participate in the campaign did not improve performance, but effective participation through adoption of campaign methods did.

Keywords: home care services, patient readmission, program evaluation

Address reprint requests to: Charles Schade, West Virginia Medical Institute, 3001 Chesterfield Place, Charleston, WV 25304, USA. Tel: +1-304-346-9864; Fax: +1-304-346-9863; E-mail: cschade{at}wvmi.org

Accepted for publication March 2, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.