Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on March 12, 2009
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2009 21(3):190-197; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzp010
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/3/190    most recent
mzp010v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ommen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Pfaff, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ommen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Pfaff, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

Psychometric evaluation of an instrument to assess patient-reported ‘psychosocial care by physicians’: a structural equation modeling approach

Oliver Ommen1, Markus Wirtz2, Christian Janssen3, Melanie Neumann1, Elke Driller1, Nicole Ernstmann1, Sabine Loeffert1 and Holger Pfaff1,3

1 Center for Health Services Research Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne 50933, Germany
2 Institute for Psychology, University of Education Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
3 Division of Medical Sociology, Institute and Polyclinic for Occupational and Social Medicine, Cologne, Germany

Objective. The objective of our study was to develop a theory-based and empirically tested instrument for measuring patient-reported ‘psychosocial care by physicians’. We propose a model integrating patients' perceptions with respect to: (i) devotion by physicians, (ii) support by physicians, (iii) information by physicians and (iv) shared decision-making (SDM).

Design. Data were gathered during 2001 within a cross-sectional, retrospective mail survey.

Participants and setting. A total of 4192 inpatients of six German hospitals.

Main outcome measure. Specific scales of the Cologne Patient Questionnaire were used. A two-step structural equation model procedure was applied. In the first structural equation model, all items were modeled as indicators of the intended underlying latent construct, ‘psychosocial care by physicians’. In the second structural equation model, criterion-related validity of the intended construct was tested with respect to patients' ‘satisfaction’, ‘trust in physicians’ and the ‘image of the hospital’.

Results. The results confirmed that the aspects of psychosocial care provided by physicians measured by the scale items are indeed indicators of the same construct. Furthermore, indicator reliabilities and selectivities revealed that the content of all 13 items was highly representative of the underlying construct. The second structural equation model showed that ‘psychosocial care by physicians’ is related to ‘patients’ satisfaction', ‘trust in physicians’ and ‘hospital-image’ in a significant and relevant manner.

Conclusion. On the basis of our instrument's reported psychometric characteristics and of the initial validity indicators, it may be regarded as an adequate measure for further use in outcome and intervention research, and as a quality indicator for the physician-patient relationship.

Keywords: physician–patient interaction, psychosocial care, quality measurement, psychometric evaluation, structural equation model

Address reprint requests to: Oliver Ommen, Center for Health Services Research Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, Eupener Strasse 129, Cologne 50933, Germany. Tel: +49 221 97112/478 97112; Fax: +49 221 97118/478 97118; E-mail: oliver.ommen{at}uk-koeln.de

Accepted for publication February 18, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.