Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on February 27, 2009
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2009 21(3):198-205; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzp008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/3/198    most recent
mzp008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guilé, R.
Right arrow Articles by Moret, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guilé, R.
Right arrow Articles by Moret, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

Validation of a tool assessing appropriateness of hospital days in rehabilitation centres

Romain Guilé, Christophe Leux, Cécile Paillé, Pierre Lombrail and Leila Moret

Medical Information, Evaluation and Public Health Unit, University Hospital of Nantes, France

Objective. To develop and validate a list of objective criteria to assess the appropriateness of hospital days for patients admitted to rehabilitation centres and sub-acute care units.

Design. Sixteen appropriateness criteria were defined by a multidisciplinary panel of 33 experts using a formalized consensus method. A single ticked criterion classifies the hospital day as appropriate. Reliability was studied by measuring concordance between two independent and simultaneous ratings using the instrument. External validity was tested by comparing conclusions derived from the instrument with the individual judgements of one, two or three experts on the same random sample of hospital days.

Participants. The assessment on these criteria was performed on a randomized sample of 406 hospital days from 17 French wards.

Main outcome measures. Inter-rater reliability and external validity were evaluated using the {kappa} statistic and prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK).

Results. The inter-rater reliability test showed a {kappa}-value of 0.71 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.63–0.78] and a PABAK of 0.77 (95% CI 0.70–0.83). There was a good agreement between the conclusions reached using the instrument and the individual judgements of experts with a {kappa} coefficient of 0.42 (95% CI 0.35–0.50) and a PABAK of 0.60 (95% CI 0.52–0.67).

Conclusions. The instrument is reliable and valid for assessing appropriateness of hospital days in rehabilitation centres and sub-acute care units. The next step in this study is the development of a tool for the analysis of causes of inappropriateness.

Keywords: evaluation of health care, quality of health care, appropriateness of hospital use, validity, reliability

Address reprint requests to: Romain Guilé, PIMESP, CHU Nantes, Nantes Cedex 44093, France. Tel: +33-2-53-48-28-95; Fax: +33-2-53-48-28-36; E-mail: romain.guile{at}chu-nantes.fr

Accepted for publication February 5, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.