Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on March 2, 2009
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2009 21(3):206-213; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzp006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/3/206    most recent
mzp006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tung, Y.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, G.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tung, Y.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, G.-M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

Patient satisfaction with and recommendation of a primary care provider: associations of perceived quality and patient education

Yu-Chi Tung1 and Guann-Ming Chang2

1 Department of Healthcare Information and Management, Ming-Chuan University, Room AA611, No.5, De-Ming Road, Gui-Shan Township, Taoyuan County, Taiwan
2 Department of Family Medicine, Cardinal Tien Hospital, Taipei County, Taiwan, 231

Objective. To identify whether attributes of perceived clinic quality and patient education are associated with patient satisfaction and recommendation of a primary care provider.

Design. Data used in this study were obtained through a national telephone survey by random sampling.

Setting. Clinics throughout Taiwan.

Participants. A total of 1910 patients.

Main outcome measures. Overall patient satisfaction and recommendation were measured by single item questions. Attributes of clinic quality were measured using 11 items: doctor's technical skill (four items), doctor's interpersonal skill (three items), staff care and access (four items). Patient education was measured on the basis of education provided on disease prevention and control during the visit.

Results. With regard to clinic quality, doctor's technical skill was most related to overall satisfaction and recommendation, followed by doctor's interpersonal skill. Staff care and access were associated with overall satisfaction but were not associated with recommendation. Patient education was related to both overall satisfaction and recommendation.

Conclusion. Doctor's technical skill is the most critical attribute of primary care quality for both overall satisfaction and recommendation, followed by doctor's interpersonal skill. Staff care and access are associated with improved overall satisfaction but not related to increasing the likelihood of recommending a clinic to relatives and friends. Doctor's technical and interpersonal skills rather than staff care and access can be the essence of quality competition in the primary care market. Providing patient education during the visit on how to prevent or control diseases may also relate to improved patient satisfaction and recommendation.

Keywords: health insurance, patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, performance management, primary care, quality management, recommendation

Address reprint requests to: Yu-Chi Tung, Department of Healthcare Information and Management, Ming-Chuan University, Room AA611, No.5, De-Ming Road, Gui-Shan Township, Taoyuan County, Taiwan, 333. Tel: +886-3-350-7001 ext. 3535; Fax: +886-3-359-3880; E-mail: yctung{at}mail.mcu.edu.tw

Accepted for publication February 1, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.