Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on June 19, 2009
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2009 21(4):259-271; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzp024
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/4/259    most recent
mzp024v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groene, O.
Right arrow Articles by Moeller, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Groene, O.
Right arrow Articles by Moeller, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

The Balanced Scorecard of acute settings: development process, definition of 20 strategic objectives and implementation

Oliver Groene1, Elimer Brandt2, Werner Schmidt2 and Johannes Moeller3

1 Avedis Donabedian University Institute, Autonomous University of Barcelona, CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health, Barcelona, Spain
2 Immanuel Diakonie Group, Berlin, Germany
3 Dean Health and Nursing Care, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany

Context. Strategy development and implementation in acute care settings is often restricted by competing challenges, the pace of policy reform and the existence of parallel hierarchies.

Objective. To describe a generic approach to strategy development, illustrate the use of the Balanced Scorecard as a tool to facilitate strategy implementation and demonstrate how to break down strategic goals into measurable elements.

Design. Multi-method approach using three different conceptual models: Health Promoting Hospitals Standards and Strategies, the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) Model and the Balanced Scorecard. A bundle of qualitative and quantitative methods were used including in-depth interviews, standardized organization-wide surveys on organizational values, staff satisfaction and patient experience.

Setting. Three acute care hospitals in four different locations belonging to a German holding group.

Participants. Chief executive officer, senior medical officers, working group leaders and hospital staff.

Intervention(s). Development and implementation of the Balanced Scorecard.

Main outcome measure(s). Twenty strategic objectives with corresponding Balanced Scorecard measures.

Results. A stepped approach from strategy development to implementation is presented to identify key themes for strategy development, drafting a strategy map and developing strategic objectives and measures.

Conclusions. The Balanced Scorecard, in combination with the EFQM model, is a useful tool to guide strategy development and implementation in health care organizations. As for other quality improvement and management tools not specifically developed for health care organizations, some adaptations are required to improve acceptability among professionals. The step-wise approach of strategy development and implementation presented here may support similar processes in comparable organizations.

Keywords: quality management, patient-centred care, hospital care

Address reprint requests to: Oliver Groene, Avedis Donabedian Research Institute, Autonomous University of Barcelona, C/ Provenza, 293, pral. 08037 Barcelona, Spain. Tel: +34 932 076 608; Fax: +34 934 593 864; E-mail: ogroene{at}fadq.org

Accepted for publication May 29, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.