Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on August 18, 2009
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2009 21(5):311-315; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzp033
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/5/311    most recent
mzp033v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soljak, M.
Right arrow Articles by Black, N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soljak, M.
Right arrow Articles by Black, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

Is there an association between deprivation and pre-operative disease severity? A cross-sectional study of patient-reported health status

Michael Soljak1, John Browne2, James Lewsey3 and Nick Black4

1 Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
2 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Cork, Cork, Ireland
3 Section of Public Health and Health Policy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
4 Health Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Objective. Differences in access to elective surgery may contribute to socioeconomic differences in health. We studied the associations between pre-operative health status (as an indicator of clinical need) and deprivation.

Design. Cross-sectional study with risk-adjusted comparison of preoperative patient-reported health status and deprivation scores.

Setting. Thirteen NHS hospitals, two independent sector treatment centres and one private hospital in England and Wales.

Participants. A total of 1160 NHS-funded patients undergoing hip replacement, knee replacement or varicose vein surgery.

Intervention(s). None.

Main Outcome Measure(s). General health status (EQ-5D), disease-specific health status (Oxford hip score, Oxford knee score and Aberdeen varicose vein symptom severity score) and area deprivation score.

Results. Patients from more deprived areas reported worse EQ-5D scores. Differences in crude mean disease-specific health status scores between the least and most deprived fifths were small: hip score 3.5; knee score 6.8; varicose vein score 4.8. When risk adjusted the strength of the association fell by about half for hip (0.176–0.083) and knee (0.214–0.117) and one-third for varicose vein surgery (0.215–0.140), although the coefficients remained statistically significant (P ≤ 0.01).

Conclusions. Deprivation was associated with worse pre-operative general health status. However, given that the variation in pre-operative disease-specific health status by deprivation score was of small clinical significance and the limited power of the risk adjustment model, there is little evidence of socioeconomic inequity in access to three common elective surgical procedures.

Keywords: patient outcomes (health status, quality of life, mortality), needs assessment, equity in health care, appropriateness, under-use and over-use, poverty, hospital care, surgery

Address reprint requests to: Michael Soljak, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, St Dunstan's Road, London W6 8LP, UK. Tel: +44-20-7594-0772; Fax: +44-20-7594-0854; E-mail: m.soljak07{at}imperial.ac.uk

Accepted for publication July 19, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.