Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LANG, T.
Right arrow Articles by MEYER, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LANG, T.
Right arrow Articles by MEYER, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 7:233-238 (1995)
© 1995 International Society for Quality in Health Care

of Admissions: the French Experience

THIERRY LANG*, ALAIN DAVIDO{dagger}, HÉLÈNE LOGEROT§ and LAURENCE MEYER§

* Service de Biostatistiques et Informatique Médicale, CHU Pitié-Salpétrière Paris, France
{dagger} Département des Urgences Médicales, Groupe Pitié-Salpétrière Paris, France
§ Départment de Santé Publique, Hôpital de Bicétre Paris, France

The French studies using the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) were developed within the framework of medical audit by local teams, analysing their own practice, in order to improve the quality of care. Four studies were analysed in this review. They were performed in emergency departments and data were collected concurrently. The reliability and validity of this French version of the AEP was assessed. The high reliability of the AEP was found to be useful to measure trends or differences between groups. The percentages of inappropriate admissions observed in the studies ranged from 18 to 25%. The hypothesis that the rate of inappropriate admissions would be highest among the elderly was not confirmed in Paris. Homelessness was the only social factor related to a high rate of inappropriate admissions in three of the studies. In one study, age and lack of social support were found to be risk factors for inappropriate admissions. The study of the causes of inappropriate admissions was important, since they were to be used as an indicator of systemic problems in the organization of health care delivery. A distinction was made between appropriate and justified admissions on both a systemic and an individual level. In conclusion, AEP was found to be an indicator that was both reliable and useful to identify quality of care problems. Among the factors found to be related to inappropriate admissions, the internal organization of the hospital proved to be one of the main reasons and a target for improvement.

Keywords: Hospital admission, process of care, emergency department, medical audit, Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol

Received for publication March 30, 1995. Accepted for publication June 19, 1995.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Int J Qual Health CareHome page
C. MOYA-RUIZ, S. PEIRO, and R. MENEU
Effectiveness of feedback to physicians in reducing inappropriate use of hospitalization: a study in a Spanish hospital
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2002; 14(4): 305 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.