Skip Navigation



International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access published online on November 30, 2007

International Journal for Quality in Health Care, doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm065
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/1/5    most recent
mzm065v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Safran, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Safran, D. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

Relation of patients' experiences with individual physicians to malpractice risk

Hector P. Rodriguez1, Angie Mae C. Rodday2, Richard E. Marshall3, Kimberly L. Nelson3, William H. Rogers2 and Dana G. Safran2

1 Department of Health Services, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
2 Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, MA
3 Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Boston, MA

Objective. Patient care experience survey data might be useful for managing individual physician malpractice risk, but available evidence is limited. This study assesses whether patients' experiences with individual physicians, as measured by a validated survey, are associated with patient complaints and malpractice lawsuits.

Design. Random samples of active patients in physicians' panels, with sample sizes adequate to provide highly reliable, stable information about patients' experiences with each physician (n = 19 202, average respondents per physician = 119) were used to assess the relation of patient survey measures to malpractice risk.

Setting. A large multi-specialty physician organization in eastern Massachusetts, USA.

Participants. Physicians providing care for at least 5 years in adult primary care and select high-risk specialty departments between January 1996 and December 2005 (n = 161).

Main outcome meausure(s). Patient complaints (2001–05) and malpractice lawsuits (1996–2005).

Results. Compared to primary care physicians, high-risk specialists had a lower patient complaint rate (0.34 vs. 1.36 complaints per patient care full time equivalent; P < 0.001), but a higher lawsuit rate (0.09 vs. 0.05 lawsuits per patient care full time equivalent; P = 0.02). Irrespective of physician specialty, the quality of physician–patient interactions (IRR = 0.61; P < 0.001) and care coordination (IRR = 0.65; P < 0.001) were inversely associated with patient complaints. Patient survey measures were not associated with malpractice lawsuits.

Conclusions. The results underscore the challenges organizations face when attempting to use patient survey data to manage individual physician medical malpractice risk. Because lawsuits are infrequent events, calibrating these validated patient survey measures to malpractice lawsuit risk will require large physician samples from diverse practices.

Keywords: care coordination, doctor–patient relationship, medical malpractice, patient complaints, risk management

Address reprint requests to: Hector P. Rodriguez, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Tel: +(206) 685-4460; Fax: +(206) 543-3964; E-mail: hrod{at}u.washington.edu

Accepted for publication November 4, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.