Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on March 13, 2008
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2008 20(3):192-199; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzn002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/3/192    most recent
mzn002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tam, K. W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lau, C. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tam, K. W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lau, C. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

Detection and prevention of medication misadventures in general practice

Ka Wae Tammy Tam, Hung Kon Kwok, Yuen Man Cecilia Fan, Kwok Biu Tsui, Kwok Keung Ng, King Yip Anthony Ho, Kam Tong Lau, Yuk Chun Chan, Ching Wan Charmaine Tse and Cheuk Man Lau

Professional Development and Quality Assurance, Department of Health, Hong Kong

Background. Adverse drug events are leading categories of iatrogenic patient injury. Development of preventive strategies for general practice setting depends on effective detection of events.

Objective. The aim of the study is to compare the strengths and weaknesses of voluntary reporting, chart review and patient survey in measuring medication misadventures in general practice and to analyze the events by severity and preventability, drug groups and patients' and doctors' characteristics, for the formulation of preventive strategies.

Method. In the 2-month study period, we applied voluntary report, chart review and patient survey to collect data related to medication misadventures and compared their detection rate.

Results. The chart review demonstrated the highest yield for detecting overall medication misadventures (2.03% medication orders), followed by patient survey (1.46% medication orders) and voluntary reporting (0.52% medication orders). Chart review and patient survey were better than voluntary reporting in uncovering preventable adverse drug events. However, voluntary reporting was pivotal in capturing sentinel events. Beta-blocker, diuretic, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs had caused 82.0% of all adverse drug events. These events were more common with advanced age of patients, greater number of consultation problems and prescribed drug items. Additional resources implicated were minimal.

Conclusion. We suggested a complementary approach using chart review and voluntary reporting in measuring and monitoring medication misadventures in general practice. Close monitoring of the events was necessary for older patients, multiple medical problems and poly-pharmacy and for patients using beta-blocker, diuretic, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on a long-term basis.

Keywords: adverse drug event, chart review, medication error, patient survey, voluntary reporting

Address reprint requests to: Ka Wae Tammy Tam, Professional Development and Quality Assurance, Department of Health, Hong Kong. E-mail: tammy_kwl{at}hotmail.com

Accepted for publication January 18, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.