Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on March 12, 2008
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2008 20(3):184-191; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzn004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/3/184    most recent
mzn004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Braithwaite, J.
Right arrow Articles by Travaglia, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Braithwaite, J.
Right arrow Articles by Travaglia, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

Attitudes toward the large-scale implementation of an incident reporting system

Jeffrey Braithwaite1, Mary Westbrook1 and Joanne Travaglia1

1 Centre for Clinical Governance Research, University of New South Wales, Australia

Objective. An electronic Incident Information Management System implemented system-wide by the Department of Health, New South Wales, Australia was evaluated. We hypothesized that health professionals (i) would support the system via utilization and favourable attitudes and (ii) that their usage and attitudes would vary according to profession with nurses being most, and doctors least, favourably disposed.

Design, setting and participants. An online, anonymous questionnaire survey of 2185 health practitioners.

Main outcome measures. Undertaking system training, satisfaction with training, reporting incidents, incident reporting rates since system introduction and attitude questions focusing on use, security and evaluation of the system and workplace safety cultures.

Results. The first hypothesis received partial support. The majority of respondents had undertaken training and rated it highly. Most had reported incidents and maintained their previous reporting levels. Most attitudes regarding using the system and its security were favourable. Mixed attitudes were held about workplace safety cultures and the value of the system. Deficiencies in quality of reporting, feedback on incident reports and resources to analyse incident data were problems identified. The second hypothesis was confirmed. Nurses were most, and doctors least, likely to undertake training, report incidents and express favourable attitudes. Allied health responses were intermediate to those of the other professions.

Conclusions. The system implementation was relatively successful, but more so with some professions. Problems identified indicated that expectations as to the goals achievable in the short term were optimistic, but these are amenable to planned interventions.

Keywords: electronic incident reporting, health professionals, patient safety, quality improvement, safety attitudes, systems change

Address reprint requests to: Joanne Travaglia, Research Fellow, Centre for Clinical Governance Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. Tel: ++61 2 9385 2594; Fax: ++61 2 9663 4926; E-mail: j.travaglia{at}unsw.edu.au

Accepted for publication January 18, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.