International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on April 13, 2006
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2006 18(3):165-166; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzl007
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
International Journal for Quality in Health Care vol. 18 no. 3 © The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved
Editorial |
From outdated to updated, keeping clinical guidelines valid
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Evidence-based clinical guidelines use summaries of critically appraised, current evidence to provide readily available recommendations for clinical decision-making. When clinicians use evidence-based guidelines, patient outcomes improve, personnel have more positive attitudes, and organizations use resources more efficiently [1]. Because new evidence accumulates rapidly, guideline evaluators agree that guidelines need to be periodically updated [24].
The terms valid and up to date are used interchangeably to mean that a guideline includes all relevant, recent, valid evidence and reflects current clinicians experience as well as patient values and preferences. Possible consequences of using out-of-date guidelines include a
Center for Health Policy and Clinical Effectiveness, Cincinnati Childrens Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA