International Journal for Quality in Health Care 12:115-123 (2000)
© 2000 International Society for Quality in Health Care
Obstacles to collaborative quality improvement: the case of ambulatory general medical care
1 Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston
2 Harvard Risk Management Foundation, Cambridge, Massachusettes
3 Division of General Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California, USA
Objective. To assess the effectiveness of inter-site collaboration and report-card style feedback of quality measures on quality improvement in the outpatient setting and to identify major barriers to improvement. Design. A collaborative quality improvement effort consisting of a large cross-sectional data collection effort (chart reviews and patient surveys), feedback of comparative quality of care data to improvement teams, and collaboration between sites. Setting. Eleven primary care sites in the Boston area. Study participants. Quality improvement teams at each site with physician leaders. Intervention. Education about techniques of rapid-cycle quality improvement, coaching of on-site teams, and report-card style feedback of comparative site-specific quality of care data. Results. Multiple quality improvement projects were undertaken through this collaboration. However, though we were careful to educate teams on methods of continuous quality improvement and to name specific clinical leaders, the degree of collaboration and quality improvement fell short of expectations. Major impediments to improvement included lack of team members' time and resources, lack of incentives, and unempowered team leadership. The primary obstacle to collaboration was the diversity of sites and inability of teams to create interventions that were relevant to other sites. Conclusion. Despite ample quality of care data, quality improvement education, and a structured collaborative process, achieving quality improvement in the ambulatory setting is still a difficult challenge. Organizations need to find ways of overcoming the obstacles faced by improvement teams in order to maximize quality improvement.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  V. Merle, L. Moret, L. Pidhorz, F. Dujardin, F. Gouin, V. Josset, S. Graveleau, J. Petit, F. Riou, P. Lombrail, et al. Does comparison of performance lead to better care? A pilot observational study in patients admitted for hip fracture in three French public hospitals Int. J. Qual. Health Care, October 1, 2009; 21(5): 321 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. W. Schneider, M. DeHaven, and L. M. Snell Fostering a Culture of Prevention in a Residency Program Through a Continuous Quality Improvement Project American Journal of Medical Quality, March 1, 2003; 18(2): 82 - 89. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L Wallin, A-M Bostrom, G Harvey, K Wikblad, and U Ewald Progress of unit based quality improvement: an evaluation of a support strategy Qual. Saf. Health Care, January 12, 2002; 11(4): 308 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|