Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (77)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BROOK, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by SHEKELLE, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BROOK, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by SHEKELLE, P. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 12:281-295 (2000)
© 2000 International Society for Quality in Health Care

Defining and measuring quality of care: a perspective from US researchers

ROBERT H. BROOK1,2, ELIZABETH A. McGLYNN2 and PAUL G. SHEKELLE1

1 RAND, Santa Monica
2 UCLA Center for the Health Sciences and the Greater Los Angeles Veterans Administration Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA

The modern quality field in medicine is about one-third of a century old. The purpose of this paper is to summarize what we know about quality of care and indicate what we can do to improve quality of care in the next century. We assert that quality can be measured, that quality of care varies enormously, that improving quality of care is difficult, that financial incentives directed at the health system level have little effect on quality, and that we lack a publicly available tool kit to assess quality. To improve quality of care we will need adequate data and that will require patients to provide information about what happened to them and to allow people to abstract their medical records. It also will require that physicians provide patient information when asked. We also need a strategy to measure quality and then report the results and we need to place in the public domain tool kits that can be used by physicians, administrators, and patient groups to assess and improve quality. Each country should have a national quality report, based on standardized comprehensive and scientifically valid measures, which describes the country's progress in improving quality of care. We can act now. For the 70–100 procedures that dominate what physicians do, we should have a computer-based, prospective system to ensure that physicians ask patients the questions required to decide whether to do the procedure. The patient should verify the responses. Answers from patients should be combined with test results and other information obtained from the patient's physician to produce an assessment of the procedure's appropriateness and necessity. Advanced tools to assess quality, based on data from the patient and medical records, are also currently being developed. These tools could be used to comprehensively assess the quality of primary care across multiple conditions at the country, regional, and medical group level.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
K. Y. Bilimoria, M. V. Raval, D. J. Bentrem, J. D. Wayne, C. M. Balch, and C. Y. Ko
National Assessment of Melanoma Care Using Formally Developed Quality Indicators
J. Clin. Oncol., November 10, 2009; 27(32): 5445 - 5451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
K. Y. Bilimoria, D. J. Bentrem, K. D. Lillemoe, M. S. Talamonti, C. Y. Ko, and on behalf of the American College of Surgeons' Pan
Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer Care in the United States Based on Formally Developed Quality Indicators
J Natl Cancer Inst, June 16, 2009; 101(12): 848 - 859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
P L Kavanagh, W G Adams, and C J Wang
Quality indicators and quality assessment in child health
Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 2009; 94(6): 458 - 463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Policy PlanHome page
O. Solon, K. Woo, S. A Quimbo, R. Shimkhada, J. Florentino, and J. W Peabody
A novel method for measuring health care system performance: experience from QIDS in the Philippines
Health Policy Plan., May 1, 2009; 24(3): 167 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Policy PlanHome page
S. L Barber and P. J Gertler
Empowering women to obtain high quality care: evidence from an evaluation of Mexico's conditional cash transfer programme
Health Policy Plan., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 18 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S.M. Mourad, W.L.D.M. Nelen, R.P.M.G. Hermens, L.F. Bancsi, D.D.M. Braat, G.A. Zielhuis, R.P.T.M. Grol, and J.A.M. Kremer
Variation in subfertility care measured by guideline-based performance indicators
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 2493 - 2500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
L. Resnik, D. Liu, D. L Hart, and V. Mor
Benchmarking Physical Therapy Clinic Performance: Statistical Methods to Enhance Internal Validity When Using Observational Data
Physical Therapy, September 1, 2008; 88(9): 1078 - 1087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. A. Hayward
Performance Measurement in Search of a Path
N. Engl. J. Med., March 1, 2007; 356(9): 951 - 953.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
T. L. Krupski, L. Kwan, A. A. Afifi, and M. S. Litwin
Geographic and Socioeconomic Variation in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2005; 23(31): 7881 - 7888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
E. S. Berner, D. E. Detmer, and D. Simborg
Will the Wave Finally Break? A Brief View of the Adoption of Electronic Medical Records in the United States
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2005; 12(1): 3 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
D. van Duong, C. W. Binns, A. H. Lee, and D. B. Hipgrave
Measuring client-perceived quality of maternity services in rural Vietnam
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2004; 16(6): 447 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
D. Mandel, H. Amital, E. Zimlichman, R. Wartenfeld, L. Benyamini, T. Shochat, F. B. Mimouni, and Y. Kreiss
Quality assessment program in primary care clinics: a tool for quality improvement
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2004; 16(2): 175 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
N. S. Wenger, D. H. Solomon, C. P. Roth, C. H. MacLean, D. Saliba, C. J. Kamberg, L. Z. Rubenstein, R. T. Young, E. M. Sloss, R. Louie, et al.
The Quality of Medical Care Provided to Vulnerable Community-Dwelling Older Patients
Ann Intern Med, November 4, 2003; 139(9): 740 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
D. Mandel, E. Zimlichman, R. Wartenfeld, S. Vinker, F. B. Mimouni, and Y. Kreiss
Primary Care Clinic Size and Patient Satisfaction in a Military Setting
American Journal of Medical Quality, November 1, 2003; 18(6): 251 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. A. Spencer, M. Steinberg, J. Malin, J. Adams, and M. S. Litwin
Quality-of-Care Indicators for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., May 15, 2003; 21(10): 1928 - 1936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
S M Campbell, J Braspenning, A Hutchinson, and M N Marshall
Improving the quality of health care: Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care
BMJ, April 12, 2003; 326(7393): 816 - 819.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
V McLoughlin and S Leatherman
Quality or financing: what drives design of the health care system?
Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2003; 12(2): 136 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
S M Campbell, M Hann, J Hacker, A Durie, A Thapar, and M O Roland
Quality assessment for three common conditions in primary care: validity and reliability of review criteria developed by expert panels for angina, asthma and type 2 diabetes
Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2002; 11(2): 125 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
D. SAROFF, R. DELL, and E. R. BROWN
Patient compliance with managed care emergency department referral: an orthopaedic view
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2002; 14(2): 149 - 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
S M Campbell, J Braspenning, A Hutchinson, and M Marshall
Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care
Qual. Saf. Health Care, January 12, 2002; 11(4): 358 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. Grol
Improving the Quality of Medical Care: Building Bridges Among Professional Pride, Payer Profit, and Patient Satisfaction
JAMA, November 28, 2001; 286(20): 2578 - 2585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
R. Foy, M. Eccles, and J. Grimshaw
Why does primary care need more implementation research?
Fam. Pract., August 1, 2001; 18(4): 353 - 355.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.