Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PLOCHG, T.
Right arrow Articles by KLAZINGA, N. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PLOCHG, T.
Right arrow Articles by KLAZINGA, N. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 14:91-101 (2002)
© 2002 International Society for Quality in Health Care

Community-based integrated care: myth or must?

T. PLOCHG and N. S. KLAZINGA

Department of Social Medicine, Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Address reprint requests to Thomas Plochg, Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Department of Social Medicine, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: t.plochg{at}amc.uva.nl

Issue. In spite of the many efforts that have been made to rationalize and improve the functioning and the quality of health care delivery in industrialized countries, too limited a degree of success has been achieved so far. This paper argues that this limited success originates from a lack of coherence among the various strategies and instruments developed to rationalize and improve the delivery of health care.

Addressing the issue. This fact can be shown by reducing the complexity of today’s health care into three levels of decision making: the primary process of patient care, the organizational context, and the financing and policy context of health care systems. Distinct rationales exist on each of these three levels of decision making as actors have their own perspectives, cultures, disciplines, and traditions concerning the delivery of health care. These differences can often result in ambiguity of goals, conflicting interests between decision-makers, bureaucracy, poor information transfer, and limited use of the available scientific knowledge on all three levels. In such a context, rationalization and quality-improvement efforts are frustrated and will have limited effectiveness. Therefore, the various rationalization strategies and instruments on all three levels of decision making should be embedded in our health care systems in a synergistic way.

Demonstrating the proposed solution. Community-based integrated care is a promising approach to address this issue successfully. How this concept might function as a unifying concept for quality improvement will be illustrated by relevant developments in the Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam in The Netherlands.

Keywords: community-based care, health services, health systems, integrated care, public health, quality of care


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
R Minhas, K C R Patel, and A S Wierzbicki
The UK needs an Institute of Medicine
BMJ, September 9, 2008; 337(sep09_4): a1623 - a1623.
[Full Text]


Home page
JRSMHome page
R. Minhas and K. C. Patel
From rationing to rational: the evolving status of NICE
J R Soc Med, September 1, 2008; 101(9): 436 - 442.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
T. Plochg, D. M. J. Delnoij, W. V. G. Hogervorst, P. van Dijk, S. Belleman, and N. S. Klazinga
Local health systems in 21st century: who cares?--an exploratory study on health system governance in Amsterdam
Eur J Public Health, October 1, 2006; 16(5): 559 - 564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
M. Ouwens, H. Wollersheim, R. Hermens, M. Hulscher, and R. Grol
Integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients: a review of systematic reviews
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2005; 17(2): 141 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
O. A. Arah, N. S. Klazinga, D. M. J. Delnoij, A. H. A. T. Asbroek, and T. Custers
Conceptual frameworks for health systems performance: a quest for effectiveness, quality, and improvement
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, October 1, 2003; 15(5): 377 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.