Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HENDRICK, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by BALLARD-BARBASH, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HENDRICK, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by BALLARD-BARBASH, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 14:219-226 (2002)
© 2002 International Society for Quality in Health Care

Technical quality control practices in mammography screening programs in 22 countries

R. EDWARD HENDRICK1, CARRIE KLABUNDE2, ANDRE GRIVEGNEE3, GONZALO POU4 and RACHEL BALLARD-BARBASH2

1The Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Center, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL
2Applied Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
3Screening Epidemiology Clinic, Jules Bordet Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium
4Pro Qualitas Salute/BCSP, Montevideo, Uruguay
Address reprint requests to R. Edward Hendrick, The Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Center, Northwestern University Medical School, Galter Pavilion, 13th Floor, 251 E. Huron Street, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. E-mail: ehendrick{at}radiology.nwu.edu

Objective. To assess current technical quality control (QC) practices within breast cancer screening or surveillance programs internationally.

Materials and methods. The International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN) conducted an extensive survey of quality assurance (QA) activities in developed countries known to have population-based breast cancer screening or surveillance programs in place. Twenty-three countries were sent questionnaires that included items about QA and QC requirements at screening sites, the minimum frequencies of QC test performance, and the personnel responsible for performing QC tests.

Results. All 23 countries in the IBSN completed general information on their QA practices. Twenty-two countries responded with complete details on their technical QC practices. The responses indicated a pattern of consistently high-quality control practices among population-based breast cancer screening and surveillance programs. Most programs performed the great majority of QC tests. Variations were observed in the performance frequencies of QC tests and in the personnel responsible for performing QC tests.

Conclusion. QC practices among population-based breast cancer screening and surveillance programs are highly evolved, with the great majority of responding countries following prescribed QC protocols. Further research is needed on appropriate performance frequencies for mammography QC tests.

Keywords: mammography screening, quality assurance, quality control practices


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
D. Gur, J. H. Sumkin, H. E. Rockette, M. Ganott, C. Hakim, L. Hardesty, W. R. Poller, R. Shah, and L. Wallace
Changes in Breast Cancer Detection and Mammography Recall Rates After the Introduction of a Computer-Aided Detection System
J Natl Cancer Inst, February 4, 2004; 96(3): 185 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
C. N. KLABUNDE, H. SANCHO-GARNIER, S. TAPLIN, S. THORESEN, N. OHUCHI, and R. BALLARD-BARBASH
Quality assurance in follow-up and initial treatment for screening mammography programs in 22 countries
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2002; 14(6): 449 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.