Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BARTLETT, J.
Right arrow Articles by CISERA, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BARTLETT, J.
Right arrow Articles by CISERA, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 14:463-470 (2002)
© 2002 International Society for Quality in Health Care


Paper

The Victorian emergency department collaboration

JENNY BARTLETT1, PETER CAMERON2 and MAREE CISERA1

1Quality and Care Continuity Branch, Department of Human Services, 555 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
2The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Accident and Emergency Medicine Unit, Trauma and Emergency Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sha-tin, N.T., Hong Kong

Objectives. The aim of the project was to bring together 17 major emergency departments across Victoria, Australia, and the Australian Capital Territory to work together over an 8-month period to reduce both clinical and operational waits and delays, and to improve patient satisfaction.

Design. The collaborative was based on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s Breakthrough Series, and utlilized their intellectual property and methodology adapted for the Australian setting.

Setting. The largest (by annual attendances) 17 emergency departments in the State of Victoria and one hospital in the Australian Capital Territory participated.

Study participants. Each hospital sent a team of three to five persons, which included the Emergency Department Medical Director and Nurse in Charge, and an Executive Sponsor to each learning session.

Interventions. The teams were required to attend four learning sessions, to participate during the action period in both clinical and operational improvement activities, and to report regularly in the form of data reports and conference calls.

Main outcome measures. Each team selected at least one or two clinical topics for improvement and at least one operational project to undertake during the life of the collaborative. A patient satisfaction survey was commenced towards the end of the project.

Results. Forty-seven clinical projects were nominated during the life of the collaborative and 32 of these were completed, with 31 resulting in significant improvement or achieving target. Thirty-nine operational projects were nominated, 30 of which were completed, with 24 of these achieving improvement or target. Numerous additional achievements occurred, which evolved from the framework of supported collaboration.

Conclusion. The spread of knowledge and innovation can be best facilitated rapidly by teams working together using a structured program in a supported environment.

Keywords: breakthrough series, collaboration, emergency department, quality improvement


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
P J Newton, E J Halcomb, P M Davidson, and A R Denniss
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the collaborative method: reflections from a single site
Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2007; 16(6): 409 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
C. J. Homer, P. Forbes, L. Horvitz, L. E. Peterson, D. Wypij, and P. Heinrich
Impact of a Quality Improvement Program on Care and Outcomes for Children With Asthma
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, May 1, 2005; 159(5): 464 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.