Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TOKUNAGA, J.
Right arrow Articles by IMANAKA, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by TOKUNAGA, J.
Right arrow Articles by IMANAKA, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 14:493-502 (2002)
© 2002 International Society for Quality in Health Care


Paper

Influence of length of stay on patient satisfaction with hospital care in Japan

JUNYA TOKUNAGA1 and YUICHI IMANAKA2

1School of Nursing and Social Welfare, Kyushu University of Nursing and Social Welfare
2Department of Healthcare Economics and Quality Management, Graduate School of Medicine, School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Objective. The objective of this study was to identify specific patient satisfaction items related to overall satisfaction by different length of stay (LOS) for patients in Japanese hospital settings.

Methods. This cross-sectional study involved a participant sample, drawn from 77 voluntarily participating hospitals throughout Japan, of in-patients discharged to the community. Older patients and psychiatric, pediatric, obstetric and gynecologic patients were excluded. The 1050 respondents analyzed (response rate >=51.1%) were divided into three groups based on their LOS: group 1, LOS <=1 week; group 2, LOS <=1 month; and group 3, LOS >1 month. Using stepwise multiple regression analysis, we explored for each LOS group the relationship between overall patient satisfaction and satisfaction with 33 individual items, including three regarding perceived reputation of the hospital in question.

Results. Some unique satisfaction items for each group (e.g. ‘skill of nursing care’ in group 1, ‘Recovery of physical health’, ‘skill of nursing care’, and ‘respect for patients opinions and feelings’ in group 2, and ‘relief from pain’ and ‘respect for patients’ opinions and feelings’ in Group3) were significantly associated with overall satisfaction. In all three groups, common items (e.g. ‘recovery from distress and anxiety’ and ‘doctor’s clinical competence’) also related significantly to overall satisfaction. Two items pertaining to the hospital reputation dimension (e.g. ‘family member’s evaluation of the hospital’ and ‘hospital reputation among other patients’) were also significant predictors of overall satisfaction in all three groups.

Conclusion. The findings show that according to LOS, unique items could determine significantly the achievement of overall satisfaction, while some common predictors across all three LOS groupings also seemed to be indispensable for in-patient’s assessment of hospital care. It was also confirmed in this study that a positive perception of hospital reputation might have an important role in patient satisfaction in Japan.

Keywords: hospital reputation, length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction, quality of care


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
S. Oltedal, A. Garratt, O. Bjertnaes, M. Bjornsdottir, M. Freil, and M. Sachs
The NORPEQ patient experiences questionnaire: Data quality, internal consistency and validity following a Norwegian inpatient survey
Scand J Public Health, October 1, 2007; 35(5): 540 - 547.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.