Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gomes, J. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gomes, J. O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 16:125-132 (2004)
International Journal for Quality in Health Care vol. 16 no. 2 © International Society for Quality in Health Care and Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Handoff strategies in settings with high consequences for failure: lessons for health care operations

Emily S. Patterson1,3, Emilie M. Roth2, David D. Woods3, Renée Chow4 and José Orlando Gomes5

1 Veteran’s Administration Getting at Patient Safety (GAPS) Center, Cincinnati, OH,
2 Roth Cognitive Engineering, Boston, MA,
3 Institute for Ergonomics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA,
4 University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada,
5 Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Objective. To describe strategies employed during handoffs in four settings with high consequences for failure.

Design. Analysis of observational data for evidence of use of 21 handoff strategies.

Setting. NASA Johnson Space Center in Texas, nuclear power generation plants in Canada, a railroad dispatch center in the United States, and an ambulance dispatch center in Toronto.

Main measure. Evidence of 21 handoff strategies from observations and interviews.

Results. Nineteen of 21 strategies were used in at least one domain, on at least an ‘as needed’ basis.

Conclusions. An understanding of how handoffs are conducted in settings with high consequences for failure can jumpstart endeavors to modify handoffs to improve patient safety.

Keywords: coordination, fatigue, grounded theory, handoff, human factors, patient safety, nursing, physician

Address reprint requests to Emily Patterson, Veteran’s Administration Getting at Patient Safety (GAPS) Center, 210 Baker Systems, 1971 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. E-mail: patterson.150{at}osu.edu

Accepted for publication November 19, 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
W. Dunn and J. G. Murphy
The Patient Handoff: Medicine's Formula One Moment
Chest, July 1, 2008; 134(1): 9 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. F. Smith, C. Pope, D. Goodwin, and M. Mort
Interprofessional handover and patient safety in anaesthesia: observational study of handovers in the recovery room
Br. J. Anaesth., June 13, 2008; (2008) aen168v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
K. Dracup and P. E. Morris
Passing the Torch: The Challenge of Handoffs
Am. J. Crit. Care., March 1, 2008; 17(2): 95 - 97.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
E S Patterson
Structuring flexibility: the potential good, bad and ugly in standardisation of handovers
Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2008; 17(1): 4 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
S M Borowitz, L A Waggoner-Fountain, E J Bass, and R M Sledd
Adequacy of information transferred at resident sign-out (inhospital handover of care): a prospective survey
Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2008; 17(1): 6 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
V M Arora, J K Johnson, D O Meltzer, and H J Humphrey
A theoretical framework and competency-based approach to improving handoffs
Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2008; 17(1): 11 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crit Care NurseHome page
E. A. Henneman
Unreported Errors in the Intensive Care Unit: A Case Study of the Way We Work
Crit. Care Nurse, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 27 - 34.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
C. M. Clancy
Care transitions: a threat and an opportunity for patient safety.
American Journal of Medical Quality, November 1, 2006; 21(6): 415 - 417.
[PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
L. I. Horwitz, H. M. Krumholz, M. L. Green, and S. J. Huot
Transfers of patient care between house staff on internal medicine wards: a national survey.
Arch Intern Med, June 12, 2006; 166(11): 1173 - 1177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
I Philibert and D C Leach
Re-framing continuity of care for this century
Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 394 - 396.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
V Arora, J Johnson, D Lovinger, H J Humphrey, and D O Meltzer
Communication failures in patient sign-out and suggestions for improvement: a critical incident analysis
Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 401 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
T Smith
Culture and incentives conducive to quality and safety in health care
Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2004; 13(4): 317 - 320.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.