Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mandel, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kreiss, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mandel, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kreiss, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 16:175-180 (2004)
International Journal for Quality in Health Care vol. 16 no. 2 © International Society for Quality in Health Care and Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Quality assessment program in primary care clinics: a tool for quality improvement

Dror Mandel, Howard Amital, Eyal Zimlichman, Robert Wartenfeld, Lilach Benyamini, Tzippora Shochat, Francis B. Mimouni and Yitshak Kreiss

Medical Corps, Israel Defense Forces, Israel

Background. Assessment of quality of health care is a major ongoing project of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) medical corps.

Objectives. (i) To describe mechanisms of quality assessment (QA) in IDF primary care clinics; (ii) to compare quality of care in different types of primary care clinics; and (iii) to test the hypothesis that implementation of the QA program results in improved quality of care.

Research design. A prospective, single-blinded, uncontrolled, non-randomized study.

Measures. Teams of two physicians carry out the QA process once or twice a year according to clinic size. Five areas were evaluated: (i) physician–patient interaction; (ii) medical chart evaluation; (iii) high-risk patients management; (iv) medical care provided by specialists; and (v) medical staff guidance. Clinics were classified in two groups: single-physician clinics (battalion troop clinics) and multi-physician clinics (home-front base clinics). General Linear Models were used for analysis. A P-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results. In 2000 and 2001, 99 primary clinics and 162 primary care physicians were assessed. Seventy-four (45%) physicians were evaluated twice. Single-physician clinics scored higher than multi-physician clinics on most QA parameters. Physicians had significantly better QA results at the second encounter, regardless of the type of clinic.

Conclusions. A primary care medicine QA system is feasible in the IDF. It allows for standardized, reliable, and comprehensive assessment of primary care across the military clinics. We postulate that the increase in QA assessment scores from one examination to the next one indicates an improvement in quality due to the QA program.

Keywords: military medicine, primary care, quality assessment, quality control

Address reprint requests to Dror Mandel, MD, Israel Defense Forces, Medical Corps, 3 Ha’Emek Street, Ramat Hasheron 47203, Israel. E-mail: mandelrd{at}netvision.net.il

Accepted for publication November 24, 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.