Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suwanrath-Kengpol, C.
Right arrow Articles by Petmanee, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suwanrath-Kengpol, C.
Right arrow Articles by Petmanee, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 16:327-332 (2004)
International Journal for Quality in Health Care vol. 16 no. 4 © International Society for Quality in Health Care and Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Effect of a clinical practice guideline on physician compliance

Chitkasaem Suwanrath-Kengpol, Sutham Pinjaroen, Oermporn Krisanapan and Porntip Petmanee

Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand

Objectives. To evaluate the effect of a clinical practice guideline for cesarean section due to dystocia on physician compliance, pregnancy outcome, and cesarean delivery rates, and to identify factors associated with physician non-compliance.

Design. A cross-sectional study.

Setting. A university hospital, Southern Thailand.

Study participants. All 719 medical records of women undergoing a cesarean section due to dystocia (failure to progress; cephalopelvic disproportion) before and after implementation of the guideline, from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2000.

Intervention. A clinical practice guideline for cesarean section due to dystocia was implemented on 1 June 1999.

Main outcome measures. Physician compliance, pregnancy outcomes, and cesarean section rates. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with physician non-compliance. Independent variables consisted of maternal age, height, parity, type of service, and birthweight.

Results. Physician compliance with the guideline was 89.2%. Maternal complications were less in the period after implementation of the guideline. Fetal outcomes were not different between the two periods. The cesarean section rates due to dystocia decreased after implementation of the guideline, from 10.7% in 1999 to 8.6% in 2002. Private practice, maternal short stature, and birthweight ≥3500 g were significant predictors of physician non-compliance.

Conclusions. Physician compliance was high. A clinical practice guideline can reduce the cesarean section rates due to dystocia without increasing adverse outcomes. Physician non-compliance was more common in women with well known risk for cephalopelvic disproportion, and private practice.

Keywords: audit, cesarean delivery, clinical practice guidelines, compliance

Address reprint requests to Chitkasaem Suwanrath-Kengpol, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand. E-mail: schitkas{at}ratree.psu.ac.th or schitkas{at}hotmail.com

Accepted for publication April 12, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.