Skip Navigation

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2004 16(5):407-416; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzh064
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Delpierre, C.
Right arrow Articles by Lang, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Delpierre, C.
Right arrow Articles by Lang, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care vol. 16 no. 5 © International Society for Quality in Health Care and Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Review Article

A systematic review of computer-based patient record systems and quality of care: more randomized clinical trials or a broader approach?

Cyrille Delpierre1,2, Lise Cuzin1, Judith Fillaux1, Muriel Alvarez1, Patrice Massip1 and Thierry Lang2

1 Centre Hospitalo Universitaire Purpan, Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Toulouse, 2 INSERM, U558, Épidémiologie et Santé Publique, Toulouse, France

Purpose. To analyse the impact of computer-based patient record systems (CBPRS) on medical practice, quality of care, and user and patient satisfaction.

Data sources. Manual and electronic search of the Medline, Cochrane, and Embase databases.

Study selection. Selected articles were published from 2000 to March 2003. CBPRS was defined as computer software designed to be used by clinicians as a direct aid in clinical decision making. To be included, the systems should have recorded patient characteristics and offered online advice, or information or reminders specific to clinicians during the consultation.

Data extraction. Keywords used for the search were: electronic record, informatic record, electronic medical record, electronic patient record, patient order entry, computer-based patient system, clinical decision support systems, and evaluation.

Results. Twenty-six articles were selected. Use of a CBPRS was perceived favourably by physicians, with studies of satisfaction being mainly positive. A positive impact of CBPRS on preventive care was observed in all three studies where this criterion was examined. The 12 studies evaluating the impact on medical practice and guidelines compliance showed that positive experiences were as frequent as experiences showing no benefit. None of the six studies analysing the impact of CBPRS on patient outcomes reported any benefit.

Conclusions. CBPRS increased user and patient satisfaction, which might lead to significant improvements in medical care practices. However, the studies on the impact of CBPRS on patient outcomes and quality of care were not conclusive. Alternative approaches considering social, cultural, and organizational factors may be needed to evaluate the usefulness of CBPRS.

Keywords: computer-based patient record system, evaluation, medical practice, patient outcomes, quality of care, randomized controlled trials, systematic review

Address reprint requests to C. Delpierre, Centre Hospitalo Universitaire Purpan, Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Toulouse, France. E-mail: cisih{at}chu-toulouse.fr or cyrildelpierre{at}yahoo.fr

Accepted for publication May 25, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
J. S. Irani, J. L. Middleton, R. Marfatia, E. T. Omana, and F. D'Amico
The Use of Electronic Health Records in the Exam Room and Patient Satisfaction: A Systematic Review
J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2009; 22(5): 553 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
J. Hu, H. Yu, E. Luo, E. Song, X. Xu, H. Tan, and Y. Wang
Are Chinese Dentists Ready for the Computerization of Dentistry? A Population Investigation of China's Metropolises
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2009; 16(3): 409 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
K. Zheng, R. Padman, M. P. Johnson, and H. S. Diamond
An Interface-driven Analysis of User Interactions with an Electronic Health Records System
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2009; 16(2): 228 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. A. Spooner and D. C. Classen
Data Standards and Improvement of Quality and Safety in Child Health Care
Pediatrics, January 1, 2009; 123(Supplement_2): S74 - S79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
I. Shcherbatykh, A. Holbrook, L. Thabane, L. Dolovich, and COMPETE III investigators
Methodologic Issues in Health Informatics Trials: The Complexities of Complex Interventions
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2008; 15(5): 575 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
H. G. Lo, L. P. Newmark, C. Yoon, L. A. Volk, V. L. Carlson, A. F. Kittler, M. Lippincott, T. Wang, and D. W. Bates
Electronic Health Records in Specialty Care: A Time-Motion Study
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2007; 14(5): 609 - 615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
J. C. Crosson, P. A. Ohman-Strickland, K. A. Hahn, B. DiCicco-Bloom, E. Shaw, A. J. Orzano, and B. F. Crabtree
Electronic Medical Records and Diabetes Quality of Care: Results From a Sample of Family Medicine Practices
Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2007; 5(3): 209 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
L. G. Pawlson
Health Information Technology: Does It Facilitate Or Hinder Rapid Learning?
Health Aff., March 1, 2007; 26(2): w178 - w180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. Kripalani, F. LeFevre, C. O. Phillips, M. V. Williams, P. Basaviah, and D. W. Baker
Deficits in Communication and Information Transfer Between Hospital-Based and Primary Care Physicians: Implications for Patient Safety and Continuity of Care
JAMA, February 28, 2007; 297(8): 831 - 841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
C. P. Schade, F. M. Sullivan, S. de Lusignan, and J. Madeley
e-Prescribing, Efficiency, Quality: Lessons from the Computerization of UK Family Practice
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2006; 13(5): 470 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
T. K.L. Schleyer, T. P. Thyvalikakath, H. Spallek, M. H. Torres-Urquidy, P. Hernandez, and J. Yuhaniak
Clinical Computing in General Dentistry
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2006; 13(3): 344 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
J. Hsu
Reply to "Health Information Technology and Physician-Patient Interactions: Impact of Computers on Communication During Outpatient Primary Care Visits"
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2006; 13(2): 237 - 237.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.