Skip Navigation

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2004 16(6):447-452; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzh073
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Duong, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hipgrave, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Duong, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hipgrave, D. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care vol. 16 no. 6 © International Society for Quality in Health Care and Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Measuring client-perceived quality of maternity services in rural Vietnam

Dat van Duong1,2, Colin W. Binns2, Andy H. Lee2 and David B. Hipgrave3,4

1 Program for Appropriate Technology in Health, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2 Curtin University of Technology, Public Health School, Perth, Western Australia, 3 University of Melbourne, Royal Hospital, Melbourne, 4 The Macfarlane Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public Health Ltd, International Health Unit, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Objective. To examine the feasibility, reliability and validity of a 20-item scale for measuring perceived quality of maternity services provided at commune health centres in rural Vietnam.

Design. A survey of 200 women who gave birth in July–August 2000 and 196 pregnant women in 34 communes in Quang Xuong District, Thanh Hoa Province, Vietnam.

Main outcome measures. Inter-rater reliability, internal consistency and factor structure of the scale were examined. The associations between perceived quality and client characteristics were also investigated.

Results. The instrument had relatively good inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. Except for two items: ‘good clinical examination’ and ‘adequacy of health workers for women’s health’, the scale exhibited good agreement between the two raters, with kappa values ranging from 0.54 to 0.84. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the dimensions ‘health care delivery’, ‘health facility’, ‘interpersonal aspects of care’ and ‘access to services’ were 0.72, 0.64, 0.72 and 0.33, respectively. Respondents were positive on items related to the dimensions ‘interpersonal aspects of care’ and ‘access to services’, but negative on the dimensions ‘health care delivery’ and ‘health facility’. The maternity status of clients was found to influence the perceived quality of maternity services.

Conclusions. The feasibility, reliability and validity of the instrument were established in the context of rural Vietnam. Its application in evaluating other health care programmes should be an important follow-up action for the Vietnamese government.

Keywords: maternity services, multidimensional scale, quality of care, Vietnam

Address reprint requests to Dat Van Duong, Program for Appropriate Technology in Health, Hanoi, Vietnam. E-mail: dat{at}unfpa.org.vn

Accepted for publication July 1, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
R. Baltussen and Y. Ye
Quality of care of modern health services as perceived by users and non-users in Burkina Faso
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, February 1, 2006; 18(1): 30 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.